Search This Blog

Monday, June 25, 2012

‘Shadow cabinet’ list backfires in Sabah, S’wak

FMT Staff 

Pakatan Rakyat's so-called shadow cabinet list has thrown Anwar Ibrahim's 'fair representation' pledge to Sabah and Sarawak into the fire.

 KUCHING: Pakatan Rakyat’s so-called shadow cabinet has come under fire here with many declaring that it was a ‘reflection’ of how the peninsular-based opposition viewed the state’s importance.

Last week FMT columnist Selena Tay revealed, after speaking to a Pakatan MP who declined to be named, a list of people who formed Pakatan’s shadow cabinet.

Except for two posts – Deputy Prime Minister 3 and at Transport Minister – all positions were swept by peninsular-based Pakatan MPs from DAP, PAS and PKR.

Responding to comments to her disclosure, Tay wrote: “I never forget Sabah and Sarawak but as mentioned above, this list is from the previous GE when the Sabahans and Sarawakians only gave one or two miserable seats to the opposition.

“If they vote Pakatan more, then their representation will be increased.”

Her comment and list have shocked many in Sarawak and neighbouring Sabah, where Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim has been busy wooing MPs and voters.

It has also put Anwar’s spin that Sabah and Sarawak will be dealt with fairly under question. The grapevines here are spewing skeptism over Pakatan’s ‘real’ intentions.

Anwar’s PKR is already facing an uphill battle in Sabah where there is prevailing questions about the party’s ‘genuineness’ and threats from a fast expanding State Reform Party lead by former PKR vice president Jeffrey Kitingan.

Said one Sabah businessman, who declined to be named: “This is not even the real list. It’s only a shadow cabinet and they did not nominate anyone from Sabah, imagine after the elections.

“PKR cannot win any seats in Sabah and DAP maybe get one.. so what will happen then. We will still have only one miserable seat unless they tie up with a local party.”

Pakatan ‘no different from BN’

In Sarawak, local folk are seething at the ‘arrogance of leadership’.

A civil servant in Sibu who declined to be named accused the KL opposition pact leaders of having a short memory.

“They have forgotten that DAP and PKR together won 15 seats in last April state election and the fact that DAP here has two MPs.

“The shadow list ignored them completely. This could eventually be the real list, you know.

“How can you trust people who say one thing and do another? They are no different from BN,” he said.

Meanwhile Sarawak PKR vice-chairman See Chee How whilst admitting that many had roundly criticised the list, said that “the list is not finalised yet”.

“There is no official confirmation on the list yet. But I am confident that eventually there will be a better representation of Sarawak and Sabah if Pakatan takes over,” he said.

He also added that the opposition coalition will “heed public opinions” in the event Sabah and Sarawak delivered on its seats in the 13th general election.

‘We are united’


Meanwhile state PKR chief Baru Bian, who was named Transport Minister in the shadow cabinet list, yesterday urged Sarawakians not to listen to news being spread by the media that Pakatan Rakyat in Sarawak and in the country is divided.

“We in PKR, PAS and DAP are solidly united having one vision and one fight, and our fight is against the Barisan Nasional.

“Our promise is that we will fight BN on a one-to-one in all the 31 parliamentary seats,” he said, pointing out that they did it in the last election.

Bian, who is the Ba’Kelalan assemblyman, said that during the last election the people in his constituency were told that development projects would be withdrawn or stopped if they voted for the opposition.

“They even told the people that their children would be stopped from going to school if they voted for the opposition, and they issued all sorts of threats.

“But after the election was over, the people realised that the projects went ahead until they were completed and the children continued to go to school.

Pakatan's Shadow Cabinet list ...


Prime Minister: Anwar Ibrahim (PKR, Permatang Pauh MP)
1. Deputy Prime Ministers:
a. Lim Kit Siang (DAP, Ipoh Timur MP)
b. Abdul Hadi Awang (PAS, Marang MP)
c. One seat for either a Sabahan or a Sarawakian who will be looking after East Malaysian affairs. (There are names of candidates but this columnist was instructed not to reveal it.)
2. Finance Ministry:
a. Tony Pua (DAP, Petaling Jaya Utara MP)
b. Rafizi Ramli (PKR, currently not a MP, will contest in the coming polls)
c. Nizar Jamaluddin (PAS, Bukit Gantang MP)
3. Education Ministry:
a. Dzulkefly Ahmad (PAS, Kuala Selangor MP)
b. S Kulasegaran (DAP, Ipoh Barat MP)
c. Chong Eng (DAP, Bukit Mertajam MP)
4. Home Ministry:
a. Azmin Ali (PKR, Gombak MP)
b. Mahfuz Omar (PAS, Pokok Sena MP)
c. M Manogaran (DAP, Teluk Intan MP)
(Knowledge and expertise can also be gained by consulting PAS member Fauzi Shaari, retired from CID, Bukit Aman.)

5. Defence Ministry:
a. Dr Hatta Ramli (PAS, Kuala Krai MP)
b. Liew Chin Tong (DAP, Bukit Bendera MP)
c. Tian Chua (PKR, Batu MP)
(Knowledge and technical know-how can be gained from PAS member First Admiral (retired) Mohamad Imran Abd Hamid.)
6. Law Ministry:
a. Karpal Singh (DAP, Bukit Gelugor MP)
b. Gobind Singh (DAP, Puchong MP)
c. William Leong (PKR, Selayang MP)
d. R Sivarasa (PKR, Subang MP)
e. Hanipa Maidin (PAS, non-MP who acts for PAS on many legal matters)
7. Health Ministry:
a. Dr Lee Boon Chye (PKR, Gopeng MP)
b. Dr Tan Seng Giaw (DAP, Kepong MP)
c. Dr Siti Mariah Mahmood (PAS, Kota Raja MP)
d. Dr Michael Jeyakumar (PSM, Sg. Siput MP)
8. Transport Ministry:
a. Khalid Samad (PAS, Shah Alam MP)
b. Tan Kok Wai (DAP, Cheras MP)
c. Baru Bian (state assemblyman for Ba’Kelalan)
Baru Bian can look into improving transport into the interiors of Sarawak.
9. International Trade and Industry Ministry:
a. Khalid Ibrahim (PKR, state Assemblyman for Ijok, Selangor Menteri Besar)
b. Teresa Kok (DAP, Seputeh MP)
c. Husam Musa (PAS, state assemblyman for Salor)

10. Agriculture Ministry:
a. Salahuddin Ayub (PAS, Kubang Kerian MP but this time will be leaving Kelantan to contest in Johor)
b. Ng Suee Lim (DAP, state assemblyman for Sekinchan, he champions the padi farmers)
(For Felda matters, Mazlan Aliman of PAS is at the forefront in fighting for the rights of the settlers and highlighting Felda issues.)

11. Foreign Ministry:
a. Kamarudin Jaffar (PAS, Tumpat MP)
b. Lim Guan Eng (DAP, state assemblyman for Ayer Puteh, Penang Chief Minister)
c. Elizabeth Wong (PKR, state assemblyman for Bukit Lanjan)
12. Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Ministry:
a. Lim Lip Eng (DAP, Segambut MP)
b. Nurul Izzah Anwar (PKR, Lembah Pantai MP)
13. Environment Ministry:
a. Fuziah Salleh (PKR, Kuantan MP)
b. Che Rosli Che Mat (PAS, Hulu Langat MP)
c. Nga Kor Ming (DAP, Taiping MP)
14. Women Ministry:
a. Zuraida Kamaruddin (PKR, Ampang MP)
b. Fong Po Kuan (DAP, Batu Gajah MP)
c. Siti Zailah Mohd Yusof (PAS, Rantau Panjang MP)
Currently, Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is in charge of this ministry. Is there no capable woman in BN who can take over this post from Sharizat Abdul Jalil who stepped down on April 8?
15. Race Relations and Inter-Faith Dialogue Ministry:
a. Nik Aziz Nik Mat (PAS, state assemblyman for Chempaka, Kelantan menteri besar)
b. Mujahid Yusof Rawa (PAS, Parit Buntar MP)
c. Mohd Nur Manuty, (PKR, at the moment not an MP)
d. Ngeh Koo Ham (DAP, Beruas MP)
e. V Sivakumar (DAP, state assemblyman for Tronoh)
The Ministry for Race Relations and Inter-Faith Dialogue will be a place for discussions on thorny issues so that solutions can be sought without acrimony.

63 comments:

  1. Sabah needs to concentrate on Sabah. Sarawak will find their own way. Both can work out some kind of cooperation when the time comes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A UNITED STATE OF NORTH KALIMANTAN (BORNEO) AS PROPOSED IN 1960s?

      Delete
    2. ZERO REPRESENTATION FOR SARAWAK & SABAH - JUST 2 COLONIES LAH!

      The lack of representation in the Pakatan line up of Shadowy ministers confirms that Sabah and Sarawak are still treated as colonies by the Malayans.

      Sabah & Sarawak brother and sisters- "Malaysia" was (IS?) supposed to be an equal partnership of Federation of Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak (original included Brunei which opted out when it got wise to UMNO colonization plan).

      Sabah and Sarawak should each get 33% of the Shadow cabinet positions and distribution of constituency seats. But we have been disenfranchised since 1963!

      What "equal partnership in Malaysia"???

      After they sucked us into Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak became the 13th and 14th attachments as States of the Federation of Malaya. Labuan was a separate colony then and was ''federalised" later on.

      Since 1963 we were treated likes kid by Kuala Lumpur who STOLE our independence AND then took control of our finance and resources n breach of the Malaysia Agreement.

      They then "Malayanised" and grabbed our jobs and not as promised "Borneonise" our civil service, education, health and everything!

      In 1969, they created and imposed their abhorrent pseudo religious Malay supremacists apartheid system under the NEP and discriminated against all Sabahans and Sarawakians regardless of race or religion.

      Even a "bumiputra" female student suffered from this awful evil system by being refused the chance of higher education because one of her parents was a Chinese.

      Like the USA the British wanted to tax them without representation and the Americans revolted.

      We demand that local leaders regardless of political affiliations to show some guts and lead the people to reclaim their national right of independence and not be the lap dogs of Pakatan or UMNO.

      We want to take Sabah and Sarawak OUT of Malaysia!

      (Hope this is loud & clear to all you Malayan collaborators!)

      Delete
    3. Quit from MALAYSIA will not resolved our problem. maybe the situation getting worse.

      Delete
    4. Betul tu, keluar dari malaysia tidak akan selesaikan apa2 masalah.

      Delete
    5. Betul keluar dari Malaysia tidak akan selesaikan apa2 masalah di Malaya.

      Tapi bagi negara Sabah & Sarawak banyak masalah boleh diatasi dengan segera tanpa minta kebenaran dari KL.

      Delete
  2. WE ARE IMPORTANT TO MALAYA WHEN THEY WANT OUR OIL

    Also be warned- Pakatan is no different from UMNO as far as colonization of Sabah and Sarawak are concerned.

    Their manifesto says Sabah and Sarawak will be more closely integrated into Malaya political; hegemony!

    They say they want to give us 20% oil royalty...Do you believe that now? Ha?

    Nia ma bun ngi diow!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are spot-on.

      The Petroleum Act 1974 is a colonial tool invented by Umno BN to take away the State oil rights.

      Since PR wants to give us 20% which means they want to continue to colonise us further instead of repealing the Act.

      Oil royalty actually belongs to the State and the State Gov is supposed to impose how much oil royalty Fed Gov should pay. Not the other way round.

      Delete
    2. But wait for it-there is more- in typical colonial fashion our Sabah Sarawak oil money was misused to build the Sabah & Sarawak Twin (so-called) Petronas/Patronage) Towers in KL and Putrid Jaya - cost well over $30 billion dollars....

      Delete
    3. HISTORY OF HOW WE LOST OUR OIL

      (This is an excerpt taken from a recent news commentary published in an overseas magazine- original building costs of "Sabah/Sarawak" Twin Towers & Putra Jaya escalated to over M$15 billion)

      Charges of Internal Colonization of Sabah & Sarawak
      ....................................................

      STAR party leaders (and also Sarawak opposition politicians) have strongly criticised the Malaysia Federal government for failing to comply with the agreements which were agreed to for the formation of Malaysia. The then Malayan government had signed the “20 Points Agreement with Sabah” and the “18 Points Agreement” with Sarawak containing terms and conditions to protect existing Sabah and Sarawak rights. These included preserving Sabah and Sarawak control over their resources and finances, taking over the local civil service and control over education.

      The critics say that for over 48 years both Sabah and Sarawak were treated as “internal colonies” by the ruling Malaysian National Front Party led the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO). They say that UMNO has worked hand in glove with its compliant state governments to ignore the 18/20 Points Agreement in plundering and reducing these resource rich territories to be the poorest parts of Malaysia. This plunder has seen the draining of oil wells and stripping bare timber land in both Sabah and Sarawak at the expense of real economic development of the 2 states. According to a World Bank report in 2010 Sabah had the unenviable status of being the poorest state with Sarawak next in line. This has been made possible by massive corruption, cronyism and abuse of power.

      The assurances and guarantees to preserve and protect local rights were given by Britain and Malayan government to the former British colonies of Sabah and Sarawak to make their proposed new Federation of Malaysia more acceptable in the face of widespread local popular opposition and fears of being re-colonized in Malaysia. At the time many critics opposed the British Malayan Malaysia Concept as neo-colonial scheme to consolidate the colonial administration of the 3 Borneo colonies Brunei (originally included in the concept) Sabah and Sarawak with Malaya and Singapore under Malayan rule.

      Malaysia was formally incorporated on 31 August 1963 with continuing opposition following Britain's suppression of the anti-Malaysia Uprising in Brunei in December 1962 and the spread of the Sarawak guerrilla independence war from 1962 to 1990.

      “Malayanisation” of Sabah & Sarawak
      .........................................

      Over 48 years both Sabah and Sarawak have seen the agreements broken repeatedly by the Federal government. It proceeded to “Malayanise” Sabah and Sarawak by taking over of the local civil service and others spheres of life and especially seizure of the oil resources. All this was the source of serious dissatisfaction with the Federal Government by the first 2 Chief Ministers of Sabah and Sarawak.

      In the 1970s the UMNO government seized control of both Sabah Sarawak oil under the Petronas Act and gave back only 5% of oil royalties. It is estimated that over 50% of the Malaysian national income is currently derived from Sabah and Sarawak petroleum and taxes. According to its critics a lot of the 95% oil royalties and income have been squandered by the UMNO government in a series of grand building projects according to critics.

      (World Bank confirms Sabah as M'sia's poorest state. The World Bank (WB) in Washington has confirmed through a new study that Sabah is not only the poorest state in Malaysia but it's likely to stay that way for a considerable length of time given current efforts in poverty eradication.)

      Cont'd Part 2
      .................................................................................................

      Delete
    4. Part 2-HOW WE LOST OUR OIL -

      “Malayanisation” of Sabah & Sarawak
      ...........................................
      An American Dr. Fred r. Von der Mehden a professor at Rice university carried out a study of Petronas the Malaysian National Petroluem Corporation in March 2007. He made the following conclusions:

      “Petronas was given unopposed control over the nation’s petroleum resources. The company received its powers from the 1974 Petroleum Development Act. That piece of legislation granted Petronas ownership and exclusive rights and powers over Malaysia’s hydrocarbon resources. Thus, Petronas, as the holding company, has never been privatised and has continued to state that it has no intention of being privatised. At the same time, the government acts as a shareholder and receives dividends”.

      Professor Von der Medhen said “The Constitution guaranteed oil revenues to Sabah and Sarawak when they became part of Malaysia in 1963.... However, through some financial inducements and political pressure the states succumbed to Petronas’ monopoly position. In part, this was accomplished through the 1974 Petroleum Development Act, which granted royalties to the petroleum-producing states of Terengganu, Sabah, and Sarawak. This agreement was further aided by the fact that the same political coalition dominated not only the national government, but also most state governments at that time.”

      The passing of the Petroleum Act could not easily have been achieved without Kuala Lumpur first removing from office the first Chief Minister of Sabah Donald Stephens (1964) and Stephen Ningkan of Sarawak (1965) respectively who had resisted Kuala Lumpur's attempts to persuade them to agree to hand over their state oil rights.

      Federal Government Rejected Review of Malaysia Agreement in 1973
      ...................................................................

      In 1973 Sabah and Sarawak politicians had asked for a review of the Malaysia Agreement. However, the then Prime Minster Razak flatly refused this and its soon became clear why the Federal government wanted to avoid a review. A review would raise issues of control of state resources and Federal breaches of the Agreements at a time when Kuala Lumpur had planned to seize control of the major resource of Sabah and Sarawak. This became a reality in 1974.

      Professor van der Medhen pointed out that the two most noteworthy “mega-projects” have been the building of the Twin Towers, the then highest building in the world, and the construction of the new national government administrative centre Putrajaya in the late 1990s.
      The two building projects were built at a cost of over M$15 billion – a large part of which had come from Sabah Sarawak oil money.

      The professor said “Both of these projects brought a series of criticisms. It was claimed that there was government coercion of Petronas to provide the financing and that these “mega projects” were illustrations of Prime Minister Mahathir’s self-glorification. Why should a small country such as Malaysia construct a monolith like the Twin Towers?”

      Many Sabah and Sarawak politicians have increasing criticised the 5% oil royalty as miserly and demanded a greater share. The Opposition united front PAKATAN comprising the Justice Party, Party Islam and Democratic Action Party has promised a 20% payment of oil royalty. This shows that Malayan politicians see the sensitivity of this issue in the context of the grinding poverty in both states and the rising nationalistic aspirations of Sabah and Sarawakians for their own independence outside the Malaysia Federation.

      Delete
  3. BARU BIAN - UNITE FOR AN INDEPENDENT SARAWAK PARTY FOR SARAWAKIANS!

    WE ARE JUST SHADOWS TO THE MALAYAN POLITICIANS!

    Why kowtow to Malayan party bosses?

    Where is Sarawak nationalism and pride that we have of our independent status from 1842 to 1942?

    Unfortunately while doing good work to defend the dispossessed land owners, some of us have lost sight of our fight for independence against Malayan colonialism which is not yet concluded!

    We have joined the "opposition" that is Malayans who never fail to show that they stand OPPOSITE Sabahans and S'wakians!

    Now Baru despite all your hard work they don't even bother to make any S'wakians "shadow ministers".

    WHY? Because we are treated as "shadows" not seen in the light!

    The reality is that colonial subjects do not usually get to become ministers in the colonizing country.

    They have to play the running dogs and beg for crumbs!

    Sarawakians stop being running dogs to the Malayan colonizers!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am really tired of all these 'dogs' situation. Some are lapdogs, certain some are running dogs, walking dogs, lackeys are some more, chihuahua, mongrels.

    Where are the Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, German Shepherds, PUHlease... give me a FIERCE DOG already. When is this FURY DAY, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  5. IF you are a Malayan and can't take the heat please leave by the next plane to KL.

    All Sabahans who serve KL colonial masters are mongrel dogs without an identifiable pedigree!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Whats the panic? The list came from a journalist not Pakatan so the authencity is very much in doubt.C'mon Sabahans,do not allow yourself to be fooled by the media.Relax lah!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Media bukan semuanya boleh percaya. pandai2lah menilai..

      Delete
    2. Semua perkara yang dipaprkan oleh media sememangnya tak boleh dipercayai 100%. Tapis sebaik mungkin dan ambil mana yang patut ja.

      Delete
    3. Betul tu, apa yang di paparkan oleh media, hanya untuk memriahakan suasana yang mau dekat2 PRU ini.Bukan boleh di percayai.

      Delete
    4. ya.. kalu media dari pembangkang pasti ia akan menyebelahi pembangkagn dan begitu jg sebaliknya. jadi kita kena pandai dan bijak dalam membuat penilaian.

      Delete
    5. Kalau tiada angin, masakan pokok bergoyang.

      Delete
    6. tapi ia cukup untuk membuktikan ketidaktelusan PR kepada sabah dan sarawak...ia juga membuktikan PR hanya mementingkan kedudukan dan kuasa sahaja...nasib rakyat di sabah dan sarawak dibelakangkan atau langsung tidak akan diambil peduli...sekarang dalam kerajaan BN kita ada menteri, timb.menteri dari sabah dan sarawak...nanti kalaulah PR jadi kerajaan persekutuan, kita akan disisihkan..barangkali peruntukkan juga tidak akan diberikan...janji PR hanyalah janji kosong...

      Delete
    7. Ada juga pihak memainkan topik semasa PRU menjelang. Pandai sahaja kita menilaikannya.

      Delete
  7. No Panic! But where is the exit for Sabah & Sarawak out of Malaysia?

    We had enough of 48 years of shit from Malaya anyway!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jadilah penilai yang bijak dan tak perlu panas dengan pandangan orang lain:P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lain orang lain pandangannya sebab tu lah ada percanggahan. Bagaimanapun, rakyat cuma mahukan yang terbaik buat semua.

      Delete
    2. Harap rakyat pandai2 lah menilai, jangan ikut perasaan.. fikir yang terbaik untuk Sabah.

      Delete
  9. Banyak sangat kenangan buruk yang kita lalui kan... No wonder kita sangat mengharapkan perubah yang lebih baik.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Banyak yang mahukan perubahan tapi tidak sanggup berkorban. Menang cakap saja.

      Delete
  10. Jadi, kerajaan haruslah lebih komited dalam memastikan kebajikan rakyat kekal terpelihara.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kerajaan memang komited pun... pembangkang saja yang memutar-belitkan usaha2 kerajaan..

      Delete
    2. Mereka dipilih untuk memperjuangkan yang terbaik untuk rakyat.

      Delete
  11. Kerajaan yang ada sekarang sudah cukup bagus untuk kita, buat apa mau tukar lagi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tiada kerajaan yang sempurna. Tapi lebih baik sedar kelemahan dan perbaikinya daripada terus berlagak bodoh sombong.

      Delete
    2. yang berlagak bodoh sombong adalah PR...tengoklah list diorang tu...PM dari semenanjung...2 timb.PM pun dari semenanjung...kenapa tidak 2 timb.PM itu 1 dari sabah dan 1 dari sarawak? baru adil...

      Delete
  12. Ada saja yang tidak puas hati, tapi biasa lah tu, bukan senang mau kasih senang hati semua orang.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anwar mau jadi PM, dia tk layak nak jadi PM.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Siapa layak untuk menjadi Prime Minister jika Pakatan Menang? Haji Hadi layak? Kit Siang Layak? Guan Eng layak? Or pelakon Porno Anwar?

      majority menyatakan lelaki didalam video tersebut adalah Dato Sri Anwar Ibrahim Ketua Umum Pakatan Pembangkang. Malah mereka sememangnya yakin video tersebut adalah tulen 100%. Namun ada masaalah besar yang berlaku dalam minda kita rakyat Malaysia terutama orang Melayu itu sendiri.

      Delete
  14. Sabahans and Sarawakian leaders should be allowed to make up the shadow cabinet.

    http://sabah-go-green.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  15. We want Borneonisation, therefore the locals should be given priorities.

    http://sabah-go-green.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the locals don't want to help themselves, then who they expect to help them?

      Delete
  16. PKR should close shop in Sabah as it has become a liability to the opposition front in East Malaysia. PKR should face the fact that it was now in a self-destructive mode since more leaders and members are quitting because of loss of confidence in the party leadership. PKR membership in Sabah had already dropped by about 50% from 28,000 previously as people realised that the leadership was only using east Malaysians as “stooges” for their political game in the peninsula.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bukan saja PKR, DAP dan PAS pun sama...kan diorang adik-beradik angkat...

      Delete
    2. Ketua PKR Sabah pun bukan orang Sabah, katakan nak memperjuangkan hak rakyat tempatan.

      Delete
  17. Sudah asalnya dari Malaya, tujuannya sama saja. Mahu kaut keuntungan Sabah Sarawak saja.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Memang pun, semua sama saja. Mereka cuma hendak memperalat rakyat Sabah dan Sarawak untuk menawan Putrajaya. Tiada satu parti pun yang ikhlas memperjuangkan hak rakyat.

      Delete
  18. inilah rupa sebenar PR...semua dia mahu bolot...tolak PR pada pru13 nanti..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kalau bersikap tamak memang merugikan diri sendiri.

      Delete
  19. PR patut fokus di semenanjung saja dan biarkan parti lokal sabah dan sarawak..

    ReplyDelete
  20. Kalau pihak pembangkang betul-betul inginkan yang terbaik untuk Sabah dan Sarawak, mereka haruslah mengutamakan rakyat Sabah dan Sarawak dalam cabinet bayangan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. STAR mampu mengubah senario politik seluruh Malaysia apabila Party STAR membentuk kerajaan di Sabah dan Sarawak. Percayalah dengan dengan diri sendiri.

      Delete
    2. Kabinet bayangan PR lebih bengis daripada Kabinet BN* Kabinet BUAYA BESAR.

      Delete
  21. Pakatan jika berani ikutlah bertanding, tgo adakah yang ingin menyokong.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Rakyat perlu memikirkan apa sebenarnya yang harus diperolehi kerana tidka semua yang kita kehendaki akan kita miliki.

    ReplyDelete
  23. kerajaan harus ikhlas untuk memperjuangkan yang terbaik khas kebajikan untuk rakyat.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sah memang orang pembangkang kuat rasuah, lepas itu tidak malu tuduh pemimpin BN, padahal langsung tidak ada bukti, mungkin puak-puak pembangkang ini malu lihat pemimpin BN hidup sederhana mungkin. BPR pada masa itu menghentikan siasatan kes Azmin Ali setelah mendapat arahan Anwar Ibrahim yang ketika itu menjawat jawatan orang nombor dua dalam kerajaan Malaysia ketika itu selepas Datuk Mahathir ketika itu. Bayangkan?? Boleh-boleh Anwar mengarahkan BPR ketika itu menghentikan siasatan kepada Azmin.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Ini pula kata seorang bekas pegawai BPR..Beliau tidak duduk senang jika isu ini terus dimainkan dengan pelbagai tipu muslihat. Mana belia terus memberikan pendedahan ini. "Saya adalah seorang bekas pegawai kanan BPR yang terlibat di dalam penyiasatan kes terhadap Azmin Ali dan isterinya Shamsidar pada tahun 1995. Saya rasa terpanggil untuk mendedahkan bagaimana ‘corrupt’ seorang bernama Anwar Ibrahim dan Azmin Ali di mana kedua-duanya kaya raya dan malah cerita Shamsidar merupakan gundik Anwar pada saya bukanlah suatu yang mengejutkan kerana telah lama perkara ini berlaku. Hanya orang yang pekak, buta dan tuli sahaja yang sengaja mengatakan segala cerita ‘corrupt’ dan juga skandal sex mereka sebagai suatu cerita rekaan atau konspirasi."

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ini bermakna cerita mengenai Kes Anwar dan Azmin dengan RASUAH adalah benar. Tapi cuba ditutup dengan mengatakan cerita ini rekaan semata-mata. Nampaknya disini Anwar dan Azmin tidak dapat tidor lena setiap malam akibat pembongkaran RASUAH kedua pemimpin kaya raya ini.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. isu rasua yang melibatkan Azmin kini menghantui mereka.

      Delete
  27. Jadi bolehkah mereka ini menjadi kerajaan??Sedangkan di Kerajaan Negeri sendiri pun tidak dapat mengawal kes Rasuah. Apatah lagi jika NEgara. Sampaikan Rafizi terpaksa dan memaksa diri meletakkan diri dalam kerajaan Selangor kerana sebab inilah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. negeri-negeri yang ditadbir oleh PR kini pun banyak isu yang berlaku di sana.

      Delete
  28. semua parti tidak kira BN atau PR kini berusaha untuk dapatkan sokongan rakyat.

    ReplyDelete
  29. banyak isu yang berlaku dalam PR ni. kalau di Sabah ramai ahli PKR yang keluar parti.

    ReplyDelete
  30. PR ni diluar saja nampak kukuh.. tapi dari dalam, banyak keretakan..

    ReplyDelete