Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

MACC panelist under fire for defending Musa


MACC panelist Abdul Rahman Dahlan's credibility is now under question after he openly defended Musa Aman over the RM40 million political donation

KOTA BELUD: Kota Belud MP Abdul Rahman Dahlan has been reminded that he sits on a Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC) panel and should not be too quick to jump and openly defend his Umno colleagues who are subject to corruption investigations.

Abdul Rahman sits on a MACC’s Special Committee on Anti-Corruption.

Last week he jumped to Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman’s defence over the RM40 million issue.

Commenting on this, Kota Belud State Reform Party (STAR) head Jalumin Bayogoh said Abdul Rahman’s defence of his party colleagues was an indication of a conflict of interest as he is supposed to help expose corruption and propose ways to strengthen approaches to stamp out graft and power abuses in the country.

“Last week he was very quick to defend the embattled Chief Minister Musa Aman, who is a subject on the still hotly-debated RM40 million issue, when he (Abdul Rahman) was never known to expose corrupt acts within the Barisan Nasional government.

“He might have compromised his position in the the special committee on graft which was established under the MACC Act. Moreover the the Swiss authorities are still investigating the Musa Aman matter,” Jalumin said.

Abdul Rahman had defended the government’s position in “clearing” Musa, saying that the RM40 million – being a political donation – was not Musa’s personal money but belonged to Sabah Umno.

He also accused the opposition of continuing to spin the issue after Malaysia’s authorities considered the case settled.

“What is the core business of Umno? It is a contribution from people for political activities. There is no law against anyone contributing money to political parties as long as they are accounted for.

“If I had RM1 billion and I like you and I gave you RM2 million, so what? As long as a receipt is given,” Abdul Rahman had said.

Abdul Rahman who is also Sabah BN secretary, challenged the opposition parties to reveal their own source of funding, saying they have not been transparent on theirs.

“Reveal your sources of income, how much have you collected from your donors. I have seen how Anwar (Ibrahim) in Permatang Pauh by-election threw money around,” he charged.

‘Chia was never arrested’

Asked about the claim by opposition parties that the RM40 million amounted to ‘foreign money’, Abdul Rahman reportedly said:” This is ridiculous, they are just having fun accusing Umno of everything.”

Last Thursday, Parliament was told that MACC had cleared Musa of graft and money-laundering allegations after finding that the over S$16 million (RM40 million) carried by businessman Michael Chia in Hong Kong in 2008 was not meant for the chief minister’s personal use but for Sabah Umno liaison body.

“It is not for the private use of the the chief minister,” Nazri said in a written reply to Batu MP Tian Chua.

The minister had also said the Attorney-General’s Chambers had shelved the matter after finding “no element of corruption” in the case.

Nazri’s reply also stated that the Hong Kong ICAC took no further action in the case after the MACC finding, while the request for cooperation in a criminal matter lodged over the Swiss bank account has been withdrawn for the same reason.

Earlier this year, Sarawak Report published documents purportedly from the ICAC that showed that a Swiss bank account in the name of a lawyer in Sabah contained some US$30 million (RM92 million) and was allegedly being held for Musa.

The report claimed that a paper trail showed that millions in euros, US dollars, Hong Kong and Singapore dollars were channeled from several firms to a number of British Virgin Island companies and subsequently to the Swiss account.

The transactions were believed to have been managed by Hong Kong-based timber trader Chia who was later arrested and charged with money laundering after attempting to smuggle S$16 million (RM40 million) back to Malaysia.

(On Aug 14, 2008, Chia, was caught red-handed at the Hong Kong International Airport with Singapore currency worth RM40 million in his luggage before be could board a flight to Kuala Lumpur)

However yesterday Nazri made yet another eye-opening remark in Parliament, claiming that Chia was never arrested by the ICAC in Hong Kong as was reported.

While Malaysia and Hong Kong are reportedly not pursuing the matter anymore from last week, the authorities in Switzerland are still investigating the case for money-laundering.

A powerful NGO, Bruno Manser Fund (BMF), is pressing for full investigations and is hoping that the famous Swiss banking secrecy would be lifted during a full investigation.

By Calvin Kabaron

161 comments:

  1. How did someone in Hong Kong get so much money and why it was channelled through Switzerland via Hong Kong, and then to Sabah? Good Question, yet no good answer from BN.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The money was already stated as political contribution. Initially it was PKR made the report to ICAC. Even when ICAC came to Sabah there were NO intefence made against this highly reputed anti corruption agency. Only a fool would intefere. MACC made their ruling on this matter based on the findings of ICAC.

      Delete
    2. Yet sadly of course the are some fractions refuse to accept this finding. We have witness the endless media circus that has been going on in the internet pertaining this issue.

      Delete
    3. What do you expect from the opposition? It is in plain sight that the answer to this whole matter lies with ICAC. Yet they did not even mentioned this, they even avoid mentioning ICAC. Strange, isn't?

      Delete
    4. It is clear as daylight that the opposition is using this issue to bring down MUSA. It is their fodder for their political quest to take over Sabah in the next election. If they are truely fight for the people of Sabah they already get clarification from ICAC on this matter.

      Delete
    5. how can someone who his salary is only rm1/month can rent a luxury jet? and how can someone who his salary is RM20,000/month can buy a luxury bus???

      Delete
    6. What that Datuk Nazri told is make Datuk Musa Aman clear from corruption. ICAC Hong Kong came together to investigate Micheal Chia cases. What we know ICAC is the most famous corruption commission in the World with their firmness. Proud with MACC and ICAC for struggle to investigate and find the truth of this case.

      Delete
    7. So mean this case not related with Datuk Musa Aman. Grateful with MACC report.Putrajaya has confirmed that Datuk Musa Aman was only cleared of corruption after Malaysian graftbusters told Hong Kong authorities that a RM40-million cash contribution allegedly meant for the Sabah chief minister was a “political donation” to Umno. De facto law minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz told The Malaysian Insider that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) probe on Musa was initiated after Hong Kong’s Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) requested for information on the issue.

      Delete
    8. Opposition should directly ask ICAC Hong kong instead of going on in the internet asking the same question.

      Delete
    9. Don't think the ICAC will declare everything out.

      Delete
    10. Sabah Rhino, even if BN gives the best answer..will you accept it or continue to argue about it?

      Delete
    11. The problem now is opposition keep creating false news, to confuse citizen.

      Delete
    12. And authorities said that the businessman name Micheal Chia was never arrested in Hong Kong due to the Rm40 million scandal.

      Delete
    13. Since there is no case, how everything started and now became the main story of opposition to play with.

      Delete
    14. And now, Abdul Rahman Dahlan telling the truth and opposition blacken them together as well, it did happened before, like the logging scandal Datuk Sam.....

      Delete
    15. Case is close, Im sure ICAC has make a firm decision.

      Delete
    16. are you questioning ICAC credibility, sabah rhino?

      Delete
  2. for this issued already explained. The momeu not for personal and corruption but is disrtibution by other to the Sabah Umno.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. already explained and investigated.. but Pakatan leaders still politicizing it in order for them to cover up their jet scandal..

      Delete
    2. it is not wrong to defend our leader.

      Delete
    3. Plus we are free to choose who we want to follow to.

      Delete
    4. It already clearly explained and investigated yet the opposition refuse to believe the truth.

      Delete
    5. Isu ini sudah pun diperjelaskan, tiada apa boleh dipertikaikan lagi.

      Delete
    6. depend on ourselves. believe it or not..

      Delete
    7. If the opposition refused to accept the decision that there is no element of corruption, go ahead being stubborn.

      Delete
    8. Although government has already explained these issues, but obviously opposition just wanted to prolong the issue.

      Delete
    9. Of cause, to blacken government image.

      Delete
    10. Its for donation, nothing related to corruption.

      Delete
    11. sekarang giliran Star pula yang ingin berpantun dalam nada sumbang setelah PR dan SAPP...masing2 mahu menonjolkan diri...

      Delete
  3. dah terang2 Musa tak bersalah dalam kes ini.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. memang terang2 musa tidak bersalah.. sebab pembangkang sendiri gagal menunjukkan bukti2 yang penglibatan datuk musa aman.. kalau ada bukti tu, dedahkan saja la..

      Delete
    2. Obviously he is innocent and he should be free from any accusation.

      Delete
    3. the opposition purposely make him look guilty so they could get the people support during GE>

      Delete
    4. MACC & ICAC sudah mengesahkan Musa tidak terlibat.

      Delete
    5. Sudah ada bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah. pembangkang memang tidak puas hati kalau bukan mereka yang menang.

      Delete
    6. The opposition is blind. That's why they still pot pet pot pet about this matter.

      Delete
    7. The opposition is blind. That's why they still pot pet pot pet about this matter.

      Delete
    8. Nyata sekali pembangkang yang sengaja panjang lebar mau bincang lagi dakwaan ni.

      Delete
    9. Pembangkang tidak dapat terima keputusan ICAC dan MACC.

      Delete
    10. pembangkang hanya bergantung dan percaya pada sarawak report penipu besar...agensi penguatkuasa seperti MACC dan ICAC pula tidak dipercayai...

      Delete
  4. This just the recycle issued la..so if have any qeustion can come any ask MACC and ICAC for their investigate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure that MACC and ICAC will open the case again IF opposition can provide any new evidence for this case..

      Delete
    2. Well many people love to see this kind of article thus the oppositions are getting happy with it. But it is pathetic.

      Delete
    3. Harryzan Aming, im pretty sure the new evidence that opposition provide would be made by them.

      Delete
    4. Recycled issue makes me bored. opposition should change their strategy, not using the same tune.

      Delete
    5. This RM40 mil saga is a turn off. Repeated for many times, only with different titles.

      Delete
    6. They every 1 or 2 days modified same issue to make it looks new and extent the time frame.

      Delete
    7. its just a same issue in different headline...opposition was kept spinning the issue to mislead the rakyat...

      Delete
  5. isu sama diulang ulang, tak boring ke?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pembangkang tidak pandai boring bro.. memang sudah naluri pembangkang, memang membangkang 24 jam.. tapi Anwar tersengih2 naik jet, tidak pula mereka bising.. double standard betul..

      Delete
    2. They never get tired of it.Weird.

      Delete
    3. sudah lapuk la cara mereka ni. gunalah cara yang lain untuk mendapat undi rakyat. bukan asyik mengkritik dan menghasut saja kerja.

      Delete
    4. Gosh! This RM40 mil story indeed makes me bored!

      Delete
    5. They have to maintain their news traffic, no news so have to fake it.

      Delete
    6. Susah bayangkan duit RM40m bertujuan untuk dermaan.

      Delete
  6. baik pembangkang pergi tanya ja dgn icac hong kong tentang kes ini untuk dptkan kesahihan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ini pun mustahil juga pembangkang akan buat.. sebab mereka tahu jawapannya tetap sama.. so daripada terludah muka sendiri, terpaksalah mereka memutar belitkan fakta untuk mengelirukan rakyat..

      Delete
    2. They could use their private jet plane to fly over hpng kong and ask ICAC .

      Delete
    3. Itu juga begantung jika ICAC sanggup membuat penjelasan dan pengesahan kepada pembangkang.

      Delete
    4. pembangkang pasti tetap tidak dapat terima realiti. mungkin mereka mau wujudkan agensi siasatan mereka sendiri saja.

      Delete
    5. The opposition is too lazy to ask the ICAC.

      Delete
    6. Nothing to ask ICAC also, the case was closed.

      Delete
    7. ICAC may not answer to opposition I think.

      Delete
  7. jgn pula dah dpt kesahihan diputar belit lagi isu ni.. mcm kita tak kenal pembangkang, raja putar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. jangan heran la.. macam mana sahih pun, kalau sudah isu itu memberikan kelebihan kepada BN, mesti mereka putar juga tu.. lain la kalau Anwar.. buat depan mata pun, jangankan dikutuk, diberikan pula gelaran Anugerah Tuhan..

      Delete
    2. rakyat pasti pandai menilai semua ni walau diputar belit macam mana sekalipun..

      Delete
    3. Bet they will spin the facts again even ICAC gives the verification on this scandal.

      Delete
    4. Of cause they gonna do that again and again until General Election.

      Delete
  8. sarawak report media paling byk buat penipuan..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sarawak Report adalah lidah rasmi dan sumber rujukan pembangkang.. macam mana bohong pun media ni, tetap tidak dapat ambil apa2 tindakan. sebab media pembohong ini beroperasi diluar negara..

      Delete
    2. sarawak report should focus on their own state problem ... why arent they continuing their investigation on taib corruption??

      Delete
    3. Maklumat Sarawak report perlu disiasat kebenarannya, rasa-rasa tiada rekaan cerita dan bukti.

      Delete
    4. Sarawak Report patut tidak bersikap bias. salahguna kuasa pembangkang pun patut didedahkan.

      Delete
    5. The oppositions get their 'evidence' from Sarawak Report only. Can we rely on that??

      Delete
    6. Sarawak Report adalah geng head mereka, asalkan Sarawak Report ada apa2 berita, semua geng ikut.

      Delete
    7. Mustahil Sarwak report boleh reka cerita?

      Delete
    8. memang sarawak report mereka cerita...tidak mustahil...dulu sarawak report memburukkan imej lembah danum yang mana adalah tidak benar dan satu penipuan...lawatan pasangan diraja britain juga telah mengesahkan bahawa laporan sarawak report itu adalah tidak benar...jadi di mana kredibiliti sarawak report?

      Delete
  9. sarwak report pernah memberi gambaran palsu tentang lembah danum. mengatakan lembah danum kawasan yg teruk dgn pembalakan. hakikatnya lembah danum adalah kawasan hutan dara yang terpelihara.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. penulis sarawak report tidak tahu apa2 pasal sabah.. sebab itu dia bedal apa sahaja yang terlintas difikiran penulisnya.. yang penting misi pembangkang untuk merampas kerajaan tercapai...

      Delete
    2. sekarang satu dunia pun sudah tau keadaan sebenar lembah danum lepas lawatan kerabat diraja tempoh hari.

      Delete
    3. Don't read Sarawak Report. Out of 10, maybe only 1 fact while the rest are lies.

      Delete
    4. We know that, but sometime is fun to look at clown in the circus.

      Delete
  10. kini sarawak report tergamam apabila penipuannya terdedah,pasangan diraja britain, putera willian dan kate sendri telah melawat lembah danum dan megiktirafnya sebagai kawasan pemulihraan terbaik.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kononnya Sarawak Report sudah menasihatkan keluarga diraja Britain supaya membatalkan rombongan itu, tapi malangnya tidak dilayan.. itu tandanya, keluarga diraja Britain juga tidak mempercayai laporan media pembohong ini.. kecuali pemimpin2 pembangkang Malaysia..

      Delete
    2. Who is sarawak report to gv an advice to the royal couple???

      Delete
    3. sudah tau ba agenda sebenar Sarawak Report tu. lagipun di belakang SR kan pembangkang.

      Delete
    4. I rather trust on the royal couple's view regarding Danum Valley instead of Sarawak Report!

      Delete
    5. Royal couple was so excited with Sabah nature heritage, who care about Sarawak Report.

      Delete
    6. Tidak tahu apa agen da disebaliknya.

      Delete
  11. sarawak report jg pernah di saman oleh taib mahmud kerana melakukan fitnah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sarawak report juga pernah terkantoi menggunakan dokumen SSM palsu yang telah diubah suai.. bila pembohongan mereka terbongkar, cepat2 mereka keluarkan artikel itu dari laman pembohong sarawak report..

      Delete
    2. Sarawak report spread fake evidence.

      Delete
    3. Tuduhan yang tiada bukti yang sah adalah salah dari sisi undang-undang.

      Delete
    4. boleh saman SR ni. mana boleh sebarkan fitnah. guna dokumen palsu lagi tu.

      Delete
    5. I wonder who is behind this Sarawak Report. The real one! I just know the author lives in UK, right?

      Delete
    6. All their news are fake, not faking photos how to continue their lies...

      Delete
  12. kini sarawak report byk memfitnah musa aman. patut sarawak report memohon maaf pada musa aman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sarawak Report terpaksa mengalihkan serangannya kepada Sabah selepas mereka gagal menjatuhkan Taib ketika PRN Sarawak dan setelah mereka gagal membohongi rakyat Sarawak..

      Delete
    2. Sooner later..Sarawak Report will fall because they only know to lie.

      Delete
    3. Betul, Sarawak Report perlu minta maaf terhadap Musa Aman.

      Delete
    4. Tuduhan yang tidak berasas adalah fitnah sebenarnya.

      Delete
  13. Betul kata kamu itu mengenai lawatan yang dibuat oleh pasangan di Raja ini telah membukikan yang mna dakwaan yang dibuat tidak benar sama sekali.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kalau penulis sarawak report ada di sabah pada waktu itu, mesti dia meroyan tak henti2 sebab prince william berpuas hati dengan kerja2 konservasi di negeri ini..

      Delete
    2. Entah2 SR ni langsung tak pernah datang Sabah. apa lagi menjejakkan kaki di lembah Danum.

      Delete
    3. Will & Kate not even have the interest to read Sarawak Report craps.

      Delete
    4. Mestilah SR reka cerita saje, untuk menarik perhatian rakyat dan ingin namanya jadi popular.

      Delete
  14. Sebenarnya kebanyakkan isu yang dimainkan tidak ada kebenaran dengan bukti. Semua cuma cakap kosong saja. Sama juga dengan laporan Sarawak Report.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. dokumen2/bukti sarawak report yang sering terpampang di lamanweb mereka juga tidak mempunyai kredibiliti.. sebab itu mereka takut mendedahkan dokumen asal kepada umum, dan sebab itu mereka enggan menyerahkan dokumen itu kepada sprm atau icac..

      Delete
    2. Biasalah Sarawak Report tu menyibuk buat hal, bagi cerita palsu.

      Delete
    3. Terbukti juga bukti yang ditedahkan adalah kurang menyakinkan.

      Delete
  15. Sarawak report tidak diterima d Sarawak dan beralih ke Sabah. Kes takut di Saman oleh Taib..hehehee

    ReplyDelete
  16. MACC tahu apa yang mereka lakukan. Mereka akan melakukan tanggungjawab yang diamanahkan itu sebaikny.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "should not be too quick to jump and openly defend his Umno colleagues who are subject to corruption investigations."

    kenapa penulis artikel ini tidak mempertikaikan tindakan Khalid Ibrahim yang menggunakan dana awam negeri Selangor untuk membiayai kos guaman Adun Seri Muda dan Azmin Ali?? menggunakan dana awam untuk melindungi pemimpin2 politiknya jauh lebih teruk dari tindakan Rahman Dahlan menyokong kepimpinan ketuanya menggunakan kenyataan peribadi (bukannya dana awam)..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kalau kita lihat memang kerajaan Negeri Selangor sendiri pun mendapat masalah seperti ini. Salah guna kuasa dan sebagainya. Jadi perlu disiasat juga akan perkara ini.

      Delete
    2. Kerajaan Negeri Selangor sekarang ini bergolak dengan terbahagi kepada 2 puak. Iaitu puak Azmin Ali dan juga Puak Khalid.

      Delete
    3. orang PKR ni lebih teruk lagi...dana awam digunapakai sesuka hati...tidak hairanlah PR akan kalah pada pru13 nanti..

      Delete
  18. Seperti yang kita telah dimaklumkan yang mana Datuk Musa telah pun bersih daripada tuduhan yang dilemparkan kepada beliau.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so opposition, take not of that. Musa is cleared from all allegation .

      Delete
    2. Pengesahan sudah jelas bahawa Musa tidak terlibat, jelas nama Musa juga bersih dari senarai rasuah.

      Delete
    3. Nama Musa Aman sudah dibersihkan dan sila hentikan mana2 dakwaan terhadap dia.

      Delete
    4. Harap Musa akan teruskan usaha untuk memperjuangkan yang terbaik untuk rakyat.

      Delete
  19. RM40 million VS USD39 million

    persoalan yang sama untuk Anwar Ibrahim berkenaan dengan isu Jet mewah,, Jika wang sewaan dikeluarkan dari poket Anwar sendiri, maka Anwar perlu menjelaskan dari mana datangnya wang yang begitu banyak sedangkan beliau hanya bergaji seringgit. Jika dari poket kerajaan negeri Selangor, maka Khalid Ibrahim perlu menjelaskan kenapa wang rakyat Selangor digunakan untuk kepentingan parti politik PKR. Dan Jika ianya ditaja, iaitu dibayar oleh pihak lain seperti kata Anwar, maka Anwar bertanggungjawab kepada rakyat untuk mendedahkan penajanya sebagaimana pemimpin-pemimpin Pakatan mendesak pemimpin-pemimpin BN untuk mendedahkan penaja sumbangan politik RM40 juta ini..

    ReplyDelete
  20. Isu ini sudah selesai sebenarnya sudah. Tapi sengaja diputar belitkan. Kerana pembangkang tidak ada isu lagi yang dapat diberikan untuk mendakwa Datuk Musa Aman. Memang tidak patut kita percaya dengan pembangkang sekarang ini. Mereka sengaja buat cerita untuk kepentingan diri sendiri.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Biar pembangkang tergolek-golek jatuih dengan labu-labunya.

      Delete
    2. Memang isu ini sudah diselesaikan, tapi memang dalam jangkaan juga pembangkang bangkit balik,tiada kerja lain mereka ni.

      Delete
  21. Selagi tiada perkembangan selanjutnya, kes ini akan berakhir di sini.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perkembangan apa lagi ya? Kes ini sudah ditutup.

      Delete
    2. Serahkan bukti yang lebih kukuh jika benar adanya unsur merasuah.

      Delete
  22. Mustahil Sarawak report akan mereka berita, cuma bukti yang dikemukakan masih kurang untuk menjatuhkan hukuman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andai pun Sarawak Report tidak mereka-reka cerita, tapi status blog itu yang pro pembangkang menidakkan kredibiliti blog itu untuk menegakkan keadilan.

      Delete
    2. sarawak report buat cerita yang indah khabar dari rupa...tokok tambah banyak sangat...bukti yang kononnya bocor dari ICAC dan MACC tidak disahkan tulen...

      Delete
  23. Susah diramal sama ada kes ini akanmenjejas prestasi Musa di PRu akan datang?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Musa Aman good performance and credibility will not effected him in 13th GE.

      Delete
    2. Musa ready to face everything.

      Delete
    3. tidak akan menjejaskan musa aman sebab sudah dibuktikan beliau tidak bersalah...

      Delete
  24. Serahkan bukti yang lebih kukuh untuk membawa kes ini ke mahkamah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kalau mereka ada bukti dari dulu mereka sudah tunjuk. tapi mereka cuma hanya buat tuduhan saja.

      Delete
  25. Serahkan kepada rakyat menilai sama ada kes ini berkait dengan Musa?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ya, biar rakyat yang nilai sendiri dengan sebaiknya.

      Delete
  26. Sumbangan ini bertujuan untuk kegunaan politik.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Semoga lebih banyak bukti dikemukakan atas tuduhan rasuah ini.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think ICAC result can be very much reliable and acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Musa Aman deserve defended from his colleagues or his supports because he was proven clear by MACC and ICAC.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Datuk Seri Najib Razak refused tonight to disclose the source of a political donation received by Umno Sabah that was the subject of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) investigation of Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Musa Aman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “It is a political donation. All parties have a right to receive political donations. As long as it is through the right channels, it is not an offence,” the Umno president told reporters after chairing a Barisan Nasional (BN) supreme council meeting.

      Delete
    2. Najib Explain : “We are not at liberty to disclose… the opposition also receives donations and they don’t disclose."

      Delete
  31. Yesterday, Parliament was told the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) had cleared Musa of graft and money-laundering allegations after finding that the over S$16 million (RM40 million) allegedly channelled to the Sabah chief minister through corrupt means was meant for Sabah Umno’s use.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz said the Attorney-General’s Chambers had shelved the matter after finding no element of corruption in the case, which was first raised by whistleblower site Sarawak Report earlier this year.

      Delete
    2. kes ini sudah selesai cuma ia dipolitikkan oleh pihak yang tertentu.

      Delete
  32. In April this year, Sarawak Report had revealed documents allegedly from the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) showing that a Sabah lawyer was holding some US$30 million in a Swiss bank account for Musa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Musa had previously accused Sarawak Report of defaming him, claiming the graft allegations were likely part of a conspiracy by his detractors who wanted to topple Barisan Nasional (BN) in the east Malaysian state.

      Delete
    2. He had said he would offer full co-operation to the authorities if he was required to but stressed that in the meantime, his focus was on serving the state instead of “entertaining these frivolous allegations”.

      Delete
    3. Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) said today it was appalled with the government’s conclusion that “no element of corruption was proven” in its investigation of Musa.

      Delete
    4. dokumen yang disiarkan oleh SR tu boleh dipertikai. kalau mereka ada dokumen yang sebenar tunjuklah kepada umum.

      Delete
  33. Kerajaan harus lebih buka terhadap pendermaan sebegini.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Semoga kes ini tidak berlanjutan sebab ini juga menjejas imej baik negara.

    ReplyDelete
  35. pihak yang memutarbelit isu ini bercakap seolah olah mereka ada bukti, tapi sebenarnya tiada pun.

    ReplyDelete