Search This Blog

Friday, May 6, 2011

Chua Chui Meng made RM11 million from cigarette advertising!

Chua Jui Meng was Malaysia’s Minister of Health for nine years from May 1995 to March 2004. In 1995, Malaysia officially banned cigarette advertising. However, the law was not enforced until 2003. That ‘grace period’ cost the cigarette companies RM11 million, which was collected on behalf of the MCA but went straight into Chua Jui Meng’s pocket. MCA received nothing, poor thing.

By Raja Petra Kamarudin

In Malaysia, the displaying of cigarette packets in advertisements with a general warning on long-time smoking that was enforced since June 1976 has been banned since 1995.

However, this has not stopped tobacco companies from advertising their products. There are also restrictions on tobacco advertising after the ban of displaying of cigarette packaging, print media advertising is restricted to only one page and advertising on television should not be more than 15 seconds. They have found ways to continue to build their brands by using brand names for a bistro and cybercafes such as Benson & Hedges Bistro and Sampoerna A International Cyberworld, for stationery, accessories, clothing like Dunhill, Marlboro Classics, Davidoff, Perilly's, Pall Mall, John Player Specials, Winfield and Winston. Holiday tours like Mild Seven Seafarers Club, Peter Stuyvesant Travel and Tours, Kent Holidays and Salem Holidays and even in the sponsorship of concerts and entertainment events.

All of these are indirect advertising strategies employed by tobacco companies. Tobacco advertising is continued without displaying cigarette packaging until January 2003, when the Malaysian federal government has even banned such indirect advertising of tobacco brands, except in certain establishments licensed to sell tobacco products. Formula One Grand Prix and other sporting events are still allowed to use tobacco sponsorship.

16 comments:

  1. Chua chui meng is bad apple...wherever he goes will bring bad luck.

    ReplyDelete
  2. pengharaman untuk pengiklanan rokok tidak dikuatkuasakan kerana ada banyak pihak yang tidak mahu kehilangan keuntugan yg mereka perolehi selama ini.

    ReplyDelete
  3. adalah lebih baik jika penjualan rokok langsung dihentikan.

    ReplyDelete
  4. jumlah tersebut sangat banyak...

    ReplyDelete
  5. langkah sewajarnya perlu diambil berhubung pekara ini.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Iklan rokok tetap ada, tapi ia diiklankan secara tidal langsung.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Katakan tidak kepada rokok. Kecuali negara benar tidak menjual rokok lagi barulah masalah rokok akan berhenti.

    ReplyDelete
  8. People already know that smoking is bad, yet they still smoke.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The only way to completely stop people from smoking is by banning the sales of cigarettes .

    ReplyDelete
  10. Iklan atau tidak, kalau memang orang nak merokok apa lagi yang boleh dibuat. huhu

    ReplyDelete
  11. Soal rokok ini, sendiri mahu ingatlah.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ya, samada ada iklan ataupun tidak, masih ada yang menyokong syarikat pengeluar rokok.

    ReplyDelete
  13. well, how to do. the cigarettes as a desert to smoker. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  14. berhambur tu pilak2 menjual rokok secara haram.. sepatutnya semua rokok2 itu dirampas termasuk si pilak yang jual rokok..

    ReplyDelete
  15. ala.. kan si pilak2 ini simpanan tetap umno/bn. sebenarnya bukan Sabah yg dimaksudkan sebagai simpanan tetap bn tapi itu 'pilaks'.

    ReplyDelete
  16. penjualan rokok sukar nak dibendung, tanpa iklan sekalipun, ia tetap akan dibeli.

    ReplyDelete