MANILA - The Philippine government is ready to bring the country’s Sabah claim before international courts even as it gathers evidence to buttress its position while pursuing dialogue to end the violence in the territory.
Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda announced the development in a press briefing yesterday where he also pointed out that a “win-win” approach to ending the violence in Sabah is for the followers of Sulu Sultan Jamalul Kiram III to lay down their arms and leave the territory peacefully.
“So what win-win solution they have, it’s all in their hands. We have always batted for a peaceful resolution to this conflict. So I have no idea what they have in mind. I think the burden is on them. We’ve always said that, ‘lay down your arms and let’s talk’. But this has gone beyond that: the violence, blood has been spilled; and so, it’s really up to Mr. Jamalul Kiram,” Lacierda said.
He also clarified that Cabinet Secretary Jose Rene Almendras was talking about the possibility of the government addressing the Sabah issue using the same legal tack being used in resolving the Panatag Shoal dispute with China.
“Secretary Almendras said the President has tasked Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr., Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario and Justice Secretary Leila de Lima to study the matter. If the group finds basis to file a claim, the Philippines will then elevate the matter to the international courts where, as in the Bajo de Masinloc case, the government will be retaining private lawyers to handle the claim, if necessary,” Lacierda said.
The STAR’s interview with Almendras and acting Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao Gov. Mujiv Hataman was done on March 6 at The STAR office in Port Area in Manila and not in Corregidor Island on Monday. Aquino and some Cabinet officials were in Corregidor last Monday during the commemoration of the 45th anniversary of the Jabidah massacre.
In his discussion with The STAR editors and reporters, Almendras said there was no way the Aquino administration could be accused of giving up the Sabah claim because they were spending so much “getting lawyers to follow the legal processes.”
In the same interview, Almendras said De Lima had told the media that “we are preparing a legal study on how to revive” the Sabah claim by going to the International Court of Justice.
But Lacierda said this did not mean lawyers had been hired since a study was still being made.
“And, based on what Secretary Almendras told me, if there is a basis for the claim and the recommendation is to pursue the claim, then obviously – as in the case of the Panatag Shoal, as in the case of China – we will elevate it before international courts; and, in that instance, we will be hiring lawyers, private lawyers, to handle the case,” Lacierda said.
Almendras and Hataman said there was no consulate or any official presence in Sabah until this time and that should dispel impression that the government had given up its claim. “The fight is not yet over,” Hataman said.
Lay down arms
On reports that the sultanate had lifted its ceasefire declaration and that its followers in Sabah would fight back if attacked by Malaysian forces, Lacierda said “obviously, they have been decimated so what’s the effect of the lifting of the ceasefire?”
“You’ve been reporting everyday that there are some casualties and, some days, there are none. So, obviously, it didn’t matter to the Malaysians whether the ceasefire was lifted or not,” he said, addressing the sultanate.
“Again, our call here is for a peaceful resolution and, apparently, we are onboard, other countries are onboard, but the sultanate is not onboard in this matter,” Lacierda said.
He decried Kiram’s rejection of “disengagement” as supposedly agreed upon between his brother Esmail and Interior Secretary Manuel Roxas II.
“We have done and we continue to do… What’s the price of adventurism? Filipinos in Sabah…We are also taking care of their people from Sabah coming home and we’re providing assistance to all these things. We continue to do our efforts,” he said.
Lacierda also said they were verifying reports that Kirams’ supporters were tortured by authorities as claimed by Sultan Fuad Kiram I.
Fuad, who is claiming to be the legitimate ruler of the Sultanate of Sulu and Sabah, said that many Tausugs who had fled Sabah had marks of torture.
“We are verifying those reports in media. Number one, we need to verify those reports first. DSWD (Department of Social Welfare and Development) is on the ground and they are documenting. We have not received any reports yet on that. So we’ll validate,” Lacierda said.
Lacierda said that while embassy officials were able to visit some of the evacuation areas in Sabah “we only follow the reports also in Sabah that the Malaysian authorities provide us.”
“It seems that there’s no fighting as… there’s no bombing incident anymore. I am not clear with what the Malaysians are doing right now. But it seems like there has been no large-scale fighting in Sabah and our Philippine embassy team has been able to visit some of the Filipinos there in Lahad Datu, in Felda Sabahat,” Lacierda said.
He also said they had no new information on Kiram’s brother Agbimuddin, who was leading the sultan’s armed followers in Sabah. “Malaysian authorities have not been able to locate him yet,” Lacierda said.
“As far as we are concerned, our concern right now – which wasn’t anticipated by the Kiram family – is the status of those Filipinos who are now coming home because of what happened in Lahad Datu. So we’re taking care of that now. We’re ensuring and providing assistance to those people who have left Sabah,” he said.
Lacierda said Malaysian authorities have not responded yet to Manila’s request for consular access or legal assistance to the sultan’s followers in custody.
“Malaysian authorities are saying there are security concerns. So we hope that those security concerns will be resolved so that we will have access to the followers of Kiram under their custody,” he said.
Consular services
But consular services including issuance of passports and processing of travel documents have been made available to thousands of displaced Filipinos in Sabah wishing to return to the Philippines.
Two officials from the embassy, including Vice Consul Francis Herrera, left Kuala Lumpur on Monday, to join the embassy’s humanitarian/consular team in Lahad Datu.
There are two embassy humanitarian/consular teams attending to the needs of Filipinos in Sabah – one in Lahad Datu and the other in Tawau.
Labor Attaché Alicia Santos said human resource managers of 17 companies have informed the embassy that their Filipino workers are safe.
“The humanitarian/consular teams are operating on a mobile basis, going to areas where their services are most needed. They are assisted by the embassy’s network of Filipino community leaders in reaching out to our nationals,” said Philippine Ambassador to Malaysia J. Eduardo Malaya.
The Philippines has no permanent consular presence in Sabah.
Earlier, upon the request of the embassy, the Department of Education and the Commission on Filipinos Overseas conducted a joint “needs-assessment mission” in Sabah to determine how best to provide alternative education to children of undocumented Filipino migrants who have limited access to public schools.
For the same endeavor, the embassy partnered with the Borneo Child Aid Society which runs some 120 Humana Child Aid alternative learning centers in Sabah’s vast plantation estates, as well as with the Indonesian Children Education Awareness Foundation and the Society for the Education of Needy Children in admitting more Filipino children in their schools.
“We are most grateful to the Filipino community leaders for being our pro-active partner in uplifting the welfare of the Filipino community in Sabah,” Malaya said.
Appeal for unity
While the government continues to fend off criticism of its handling of the crisis, Sen. Francis Escudero is appealing to politicians and the public in general to support the President’s Sabah initiatives.
“Let the president decide on the Sabah issue. Let’s respect and support the President because he’s carrying a heavy burden,” Escudero said in Filipino in a press briefing in Malolos City.
He explained that in dealing with Sabah crisis, it is important that the country speaks in one voice. “Let’s not expose our dirty laundry in public. Let the President do the talking and let’s support him – right or wrong. Payback time should come later,” he said.
The re-electionist senator also asked candidates in the coming polls to refrain from taking advantage of the issue.
“Let’s not dip our fingers into it. National interest is the issue here, not improving the image of politicians,” he said.
He also scoffed at proposals that the country send an armed group to rescue the sultanate’s remaining followers in Lahad Datu. He said Malaysia is unlikely to allow a foreign armed group to intrude into its territory.
Escudero said Malacañang had exercised the same restraint in dealing with the Chinese on the Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal issue.
“Had we sent Navy ships to Scarborough, the Chinese would have made the same move or even more,” he said.
In Tagum City in Davao del Sur, United Nationalist Alliance senatorial candidate Mitos Magsaysay said President Aquino must personally appeal to the Prime Minister of Malaysia to stop the attacks in Sabah.
Magsaysay also expressed relief that the President had finally acknowledged the legitimacy of the Philippines’ Sabah claim.
“Why didn’t he talk to the Malaysian prime minister? Everytime there is death, it will get worse, the situation will get worse. He should appeal because it will not die down,” Magsaysay told reporters. With Pia Lee-Brago, Jose Rodel Clapano, Dino Balabo.
By Aurea Calica PhilStar
DEAR FILIPINO LAWYERS DON'T MISS OUT READING THE 'MADRID PROTOCOL" ARTICLE 111
ReplyDeleteMADRID PROTOCOL RECOGNISED BRITISH COLONIAL SOVEREIGNTY OVER NORTH BORNEO (SABAH) 1885.
In 1885 a "Big Power" re-drawing of the world map took place and North Borneo was traded between Spain and Britain like a piece of real estate.
Britain Spain and Germany signed an international treaty called the "Madrid Protocol" recognising Spain's sovereignty and authority over the Jolos (Sulus).
Article 111 of the Madrid protocol recognised Britain's sovereignty and control over the territory of North Borneo.
ARTICLE III says as follows:
"The Spanish Government renounces, as far as regards the British Government, all claims of sovereignty over the territories of the continent of Borneo, which belong, or which have belonged in the past to the Sultan of Sulu (Jolo), and which comprise the neighbouring islands of Balambangan, Banguey, and Malawali, as well as all those comprised within a zone of three maritime leagues from the coast, an d which form part of the territories administered by the Company styled the “British North Borneo Company.”
The article noted that "....Borneo, which belong, or which have belonged in the past to the Sultan of Sulu (Jolo)"
It seems that by 1885 North Borneo was likely no longer under the nominal control of the Sulu Sultanate as the Article says "which have belonged..."
A complete copy of the Madrid Protocol may be found on this link:
http://www.lawnet.sabah.gov.my/Lawnet/SabahLaws/Treaties/Protocol%28Madrid%29.pdf
This treaty clearly established British control over North Borneo.
It is noted that since 1521 the Spanish presence was never effectively established in North Borneo. And in 1762 Britain invaded and captured Manila and ruled for a short period which ended by the Treaty of "Peace of Paris" 1763. The Philippines was not mentioned in the treaty.
The USA caveated its interest in North Borneo twice early last century- purely out of imperialist competition with Britain.
In 1963 the much weakened "Big Power" Britain re-drew the map of S. E. Asia by transferring colonial power over North Borneo and Sarawak to another small time foreign power Malaya under the Malaysia Treaty.
The Philippines opposed this plan and made its claim on North Borneo.
In the previous centuries in all these trading of territories the people's wishes in the Borneo colonies have been ignored.
[It is noted that the nations of S.E. Asia are largely the creation of the foreign big powers.
Indonesia today is the template of the Dutch East Indies Empire with the exception of East Timor which was occupied and rule by Portugal for over 400 years. So is the Philippines a template of the Spanish South East Asian empire. None of them existed as independent states in their present form.
The same applies to Malaysia which the British cobbled together in 1963 and it fell apart in 1965 when Singapore left the ill-fated union.]
In the new century the people of Sabah are increasingly rising up to re-claim their country for themselves and to assert their right to self-determination free from any form of foreign rule- ESPECIALL FOREIGN MALAYAN UMNO RULE!
INI KALI LAH!
I don't need any law to know where my home is.
ReplyDeletePrecisely!
DeleteSabahans live in Sabah. Sarawakians in Sarawak and UMNO BN lovers may think their home is actually Malaya. They can migrate there and good riddance!
AND, Malayans want to take over our 2 countries by using illegals! The Malayan army is already occupying Sabah and Sarawak.
This is called colonialism.
Can any one give a better description.
Malaysia akan menang mudah dalam isu tuntutan ke atas Sabah jika kerajaan Filipina dan Malaysia bersetuju membawa perkara itu ke Mahkamah Keadilan Antarabangsa (ICJ), kata seorang pakar sejarah terkemuka tanah air.
ReplyDeleteMereka harus bermual dengan cara tuntutan yang betul dan bukannya melalui serangan senjata.
DeleteTuntuan melalui keganasan adalah keji dan seakan ditolak.
DeleteProfesor Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Kim berkata ini berdasarkan rekod dan bukti sejarah yang jelas menunjukkan Sabah adalah milik Malaysia. Khoo berkata jika sekalipun diadakan satu lagi pungutan suara mengenai hasrat rakyat Sabah, "semua rekod menyebelahi kita".
ReplyDelete"Jika kerajaan Filipina membawa isu tuntutan ke ICJ, mereka akan kalah, sama seperti mereka kalah dalam isu tuntutan Sipadan. "Mereka telah tidak 'mengendali' pulau ini sejak 1873. Lebih penting, rakyat Sabah telah bersetuju menjadi sebahagian daripada Malaysia. Ini keputusan dicapai Suruhanjya Cobbold sebelum pembentukan Malaysia," katanya.
ReplyDeleteKerajaan Malaysia akan buat yang tebaik untuk mengukuhkan tanah air Sabah miliki Malaysia.
DeleteBeliau bercakap kepada pemberita selepas menyampaikan ceramah di Forum Kepimpinan Pusat Pengajian Kerajaan Razak (RSOG) berjudul "Multibudaya di Malaysia: Adakah suasana wujud seperti seharusnya?" di Menara Prisma di sini Rabu.
ReplyDeleteKhoo diminta mengulas laporan bahawa kerajaan Filipina telah meminta sepasukan peguam kanan mengkaji tuntutan negara itu ke atas Sabah yang kini terhenti. Debat mengenai tuntutan ke atas Sabah oleh kerajaan Filipina dan Kesultanan Sulu timbul kembali berikutan insiden pencerobohan di pantai timur Sabah baru-baru ini.
ReplyDeleteTuntutan ini sudah berakhir, tidak perlu teruskan apa-apa lagi. Tambahan lagi, Kesultanan Sulu sudah pun tamat bertahun-tahun.
DeleteBukankah lebih baik Sabah dalam tangan Malaysia. Rakyat Sabah juga syukur sebagai warganegara Malaysia.
DeleteBagaimanapun, Khoo berkata Kesultanan Sulu tidak boleh membawa kes itu ke ICJ kerana ia bukan sebuah negara berdaulat. "Sulu sendiri tidak boleh berdepan dengan Malaysia...sukar untuk pergi ke ICJ kecuali Manila sedia membantu mereka. "Saya tidak pasti Sulu dan Manila dapat bekerjasama (dalam isu tuntutan ke atas Sabah). Mereka tidak pernah bersepakat," kata beliau.
ReplyDeleteThere are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteMost heirs to long-dead sultanates would be laughed out of the room if they laid claim to modern territory on the basis of a 135-year old claim. Yet, with the self-styled Sultan of Sulu sending an armed gang to invade Sabah on the basis of such a claim, let us consider whether his claim is valid.
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, Jamalul Kiram is just one of nine claimants to the defunct title of Sultan of Sulu. He is by no means the recognised heir, rather he has chosen to call himself the "Sultan", his brother the "Crown Prince", and his daughter "Princess" etc. More importantly, the Sulu sultanate was itself abolished way back in 1917. This would a laughable situation if the Kirams weren't backed up by an armed gang, ready to kill in a desperate bid to be taken seriously.
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteThe Sulu claim to Sabah stems from its acquisition by the Sulu sultanate in 1704 as a reward for helping the Sultan of Brunei to quell a rebellion. In 1878, the then Sulu ruler ceded the territory to the British North Borneo Company (NBC), which, in turn, transferred sovereign rights over Sabah to Britain in 1946.
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteWhen the British granted independence to the Federation of Malaysia in 1963, Sabah was one of the territories turned over to Malaysia, which continues to pay a token rent to the heirs of the Sulu sultanate to this day. That in a nutshell is the history.
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteIt is important to remember that, after Sabah was ceded to Britain in 1946, neither the Sulu clan, nor the Philippine government that was its formal successor, made any claim on Sabah till 1962. The fact that they didn't see fit to raise this claim for sixteen years shows that they realised an opportunity much later.
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteThe legal question centred on the translation of the Malay-Arabic word 'pajak' that appeared in the vernacular version of the 1878 agreement that handed Sabah over to the British North Borneo Company (NBC). In common parlance, the term could be used to denote both "to lease" or "to cede".
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteThe British and Malayan governments pointed out that the English language document agreed by the Sultan of Sulu categorically stated that the land was ceded "forever and until the end of time", and not leased as the Philippines claimed.
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteMalaya's position was further reinforced by the International Court of Justice ruling that "a historic title, no matter how persuasively claimed on the basis of legal instruments and exercise of authority, cannot – except in the most extraordinary circumstances – prevail in law over the rights of non-self-governing people to claim independence and establish their sovereignty through the exercise of bona fide self-determination."
There are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, in line with the internationally accepted principle of self-determination, the people of Sabah expressed their preference to join the larger Malaysian Federation through a free referendum in 1962 that was supervised by a United Nations fact-finding mission.
YUP.. INDEED BUT WAS IT JOINED MALAYSIA OR TOGETHER FORMED MALAYSIA...THAT TOO WOULD SURFACED DURING THE FACT FINDING MISSION, I FOR ONE HOPED THAT THIS WILL ACTUALLY HAPPEN SO THAT THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH WILL PREVAIL...SABAHANS PRAY THAT THIS WILL HAPPEN ! !
DeleteThere are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteAnd again in the 1963 election, the majority of the people of Sabah showed they had no desire to be a part of the Philippines, or, for that matter, of the historical Sulu sultanate.
Sabah sudah bersama Malaysia dengan baik dan aman, tidak perlu buat apa-apa lagi untuk mengubah yang tidak perlukan.
DeleteThere are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteThat is where the matter rests today. To mollify Jamalul Kiram, the Philippine government is now considering taking Malaysia to the International Court of Justice, but any Philippine claim to Sabah stands little chance of being recognised.
Biarlah mahkamah menentukannya agar Sultan Sulu ini terima hakikat.
DeleteThere are a number of methods of territorial acquisition under international law, among others, through conquest, prescription and cession. the most relevant method for Sabah is obviously through cession and prescription.
ReplyDeleteIt is perhaps ironic that Sabah first came into Sulu possession in 1704 because they helped end an uprising, yet in 2013 the Sulu claimants are trying to regain it by attempting an armed intrusion themselves. This is their last stab at history, before the Sulu claim will have to give way finally to the modern reality.
The Sulu Sultanate no longer has any legal claim over Sabah since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) recognised Malaysia’s rights and sovereignty over the east Malaysian state and its surrounding islands during a territorial dispute in 2002,
ReplyDeleteMereka seolah perompak dan masuk merompak secara ganas.
DeleteThe ICJ recognised Malaysia’s claim in its decision on the dispute between Malaysia and Indonesia over the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan off the coast of Sabah in December 2002. The Philippines had at the time applied to intervene in the case, but its application was rejected.
ReplyDeleteThe Sultanate of Sulu had, by its several actions and by various separate instruments between 19 April 1851 and 26 June 1946, relinquished and ceded all of its rights, interests and dominion over what was previously referred to as North Borneo,” council vice-president Christopher Leong said here in a statement.
ReplyDelete“The Sultanate of Sulu, even if such an entity were to legally exist today, has no subsisting legitimate claim to Sabah.”
ReplyDeleteThe Sulu Sultanate has laid claim to Sabah, saying it had merely leased North Borneo in 1878 to the British North Borneo Company for an annual payment of 5,000 Malayan dollars then, which was increased to 5,300 Malayan dollars in 1903.
ReplyDeleteSabah, however, joined Malaya, Sarawak and Singapore to form Malaysia in 1963, after which Malaysia continued paying an annual stipend of RM5,300 to the Sulu sultanate on the basis of the sultanate ceding the Borneo state.
ReplyDeleteIn a referendum organised by the Cobbold Commission in 1962, the people of Sabah voted overwhelmingly to join Malaysia.
ReplyDeleteHistorians insisted that Sabah belongs to Malaysia and cannot be claimed by others as Sabahans had agreed to the formation of Malaysia in a referendum held by the Cobbold Commission in 1962.
ReplyDeleteHead of Social Science School History Programme, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Mosli Tarsat said historical evidence clearly shows the status of Sabah as a valid part of Malaysia and recognised by the United Nations (UN).
DeleteAlthough Sabah, formerly known as North Borneo before the formation of Malaysia, was controlled and influenced by The Sultanate of Brunei and Sulu, the North Borneo Chartered Company, Japan and the British, but after 1963, the situation changed after the formation of Malaysia," he told Bernama.
DeleteThe Cobbold Commission which held a four month referendum of Sabah and Sarawak for the formation of Malaysia received 2,200 memorandum with about 80 percent of the people supporting the creation of Malaysia.
DeleteThe Commission's report was submitted to the British government and Malaysia was formed by combining Malaya, Singapore, Brunei, Sarawak and Sabah (North Borneo).
Delete"Therefore, Sabah officially joined Malaysia on September 16, 1963 after gaining independence on August 31, 1963," he said supporting a statement by Information Communications and Culture Minister, Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim that Sabah rightfully belongs to Malaysia according to international law and cannot be claimed by any party.
DeleteIn Kuala Lumpur, Prof Dr Ramlah Adam who also agreed with the statement by Rais said Malaysia is a sovereign state that is recognised globally.
"As such, there is no question of claim by any party. The statement by the Information Communications and Culture Minister is historically accurate," said the Main Fellow, Strategic Studies Unit, Universiti Malaysia Perlis when contacted here.
Ramlah said the referendum on Sabah and Sarawak by the Cobbold Commission, is similar to the Singapore Referendum for the formation of Malaysia in 1962.
Delete"They cannot claim just based on history. For example, the Siam government handed Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu over to the British and cannot claim the states."
Ramlah said Malaysians, especially those in Sabah must be clear about the matter so that the country will remain peaceful and support national sovereignty.
Delete"We are talking about the security and sovereignty of the country. This is not the time to politicise this issue or blame the government," said Ramlah.
DeleteProf Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Kim said North Borneo (Sabah) was separated from Sulu since 1885 and was administered by the North Borneo Chartered Company.
Delete"This matter (separation of Sabah from Sulu) happened long before the Cobbold Commission came in 1963. As such, it is difficult to change the situation," he added.
DeleteTuntutan ini pasti tidak akan berhasil.
DeleteMereka tidak jelas dengan syarat pembentukan Malaysia?
DeleteImmediate action is needed.
ReplyDeleteJangan biarkan sampah tu berkeliaran.
ReplyDeleteCooperation is needed.
ReplyDeleteIndeed. Semua lapisan masyarakat harus berusaha menindas keganasan yang tidak berkemanusian ini.
DeleteWhatever it is, Malaysia is going to win.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteTindakan pengganas militan dari selatan Filipina menceroboh Sabah hanya mengikut nafsu dan berkepentingan peribadi, bukannya atas kepentingan agama Islam.
ReplyDeleteBekas Mufti Negeri Johor yang juga Penasihat Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Johor Datuk Nooh Gadot berkata tindakan mereka itu tidak membawa sebarang makna dan tersasar daripada landasan Islam.
ReplyDelete"Mereka berjuang ikut hawa nafsu, taksub, ikut syaitan, ada kepentingan peribadi dan bukan kepentingan agama serta menyelamatkan negara," katanya.
Pengganas militan itu melakukan pencerobohan di Kampung Tanduo pada 12 Feb kononnya berjuang untuk mendapat hak mereka di Sabah.Nooh berkata perjuangan kumpulan pengganas itu jauh sekali untuk agama dan negara mereka, malah bertindak tanpa perikemanusiaan selain menggugat keamanan umat Islam lain di negara ini, terutama di kawasan Lahad Datu.
ReplyDelete"Dalam peperangan Islam, kalau membunuh seseorang musuh diharamkan mayat mereka diapa-apakan sebagai menghormati mayat musuh," kata Nooh, yang juga Anggota Majlis Diraja Johor.
ReplyDeleteBeliau menyifatkan tindakan pencerobohan oleh pengganas militan itu tidak mengikut lunas kemanusiaan, tuntutan dan budaya Islam serta undang-undang antarabangsa.
ReplyDelete"Keputusan dan tindakan kerajaan memerangi pengganas militan ini untuk melindungi nyawa umat Islam di negara ini adalah sesuai dan wajib dilakukan atas tuntutan Islam. Ia bagi memastikan keamanan dan kedaulatan negara terus dijaga," katanya.
ReplyDeleteMengulas misi kemanusiaan itu, Nooh yang menjadi penasihat majlis gabungan membabitkan 360 persatuan bukan kerajaan Melayu Johor, berkata ia dibuat atas keprihatinan rakyat negeri itu terhadap mereka yang terjejas akibat tindakan pengganas militan dan anggota pasukan keselamatan yang terkorban.
ReplyDeleteKami harus kerjasama menindas tuntutan yang tidak munasabah ini dan juga yang menyebabkan kematian yang tidak diperlukan.
ReplyDeleteIni juga kelemahan kerajaan tidak dapat mempertahankan sebelum kematian berlaku.
Delete