Search This Blog

Sunday, December 18, 2011

EC should come under the purview of Parliament

BN says no to indelible ink.

KOTA KINABALU, 17 Dec 2011: Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) said the Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders were behind the last minute cancellation of the use of indelible ink during the last 12th general election.

Its Deputy President Datuk Eric Majimbun said they (BN) had a hand in the cancellation of the proposal to use the ink which was recommended by the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC).

"No Wonder all these years the Election Commission (EC) could not function without the present government's order. The indelible ink cost more than RM2 million have now gone to the drain," he said in a statement, here.

Eric who is also the Member of Parliament for Sepanggar said he wondered whether the cancellation was due to security or other mischievious reasons.

He further said that it is everyone guess what the measures EC would employ on electoral reforms to be used in the coming general election.

He said the EC secretary Kamaruddin Mohamed Baria's statement that the EC falls administratively under the Prime Minister’s Department and not under the purview of Parliament had clearly explained where the order to cancel the use of the ink came from.

Eric added that the EC, it appears, is bogged down by 'real' clout.

"This is very disturbing and disheartening.What an amaze EC does not fall under the purview of Parliament," he added.

He went on saying that in a democratic country, a commission normally comes directly under the purview of Parliament.

However,the Malaysian EC need the government to approve recommendations proposed by the PSC on electoral reforms before implementing them.

Recently, EC deputy chairman Wan Ahmad Wan Omar reportedly said the federal government must approved the PSC’s recommendations before they can be implemented.

He said that “even a small change in regulation” would need to be approved by the government, although he agreed with observers that some recommendations such as the use of indelible ink did not require amendments to the law.

Wan Ahmad’s comments followed PSC chairman, Datuk Seri Dr. Maximus Ongkili’s statement that the PSC committee would table its full report which could include more proposals for electoral reforms in March or early April next year.

15 comments:

  1. EC=UMNO/BN
    JPN=UMNO/BN
    IMIGRESEN=UMNO/BN
    PROEK IC=UMNO
    PATI=UMNO

    Malaysia diperintah oleh PATI

    Mampus2! Mampus EC!
    Mampus2! Mampus JPN/Imigresen!
    Mampus2! Mampus Polis!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Saya anak Samah Sabah dan berbangga
    UMNO BN = PENIPU
    UMNO BN = PATI
    UMNO BN = Parti import Malaya
    UMNO BN = EC + PAIRIN

    Gonzales
    Ex Green Beret (1st MSSR)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Harap2 PSC akan membuahkan hasil yang baik untuk penambahbaikan pilihanraya.

    ReplyDelete
  4. semoga parlimen meluluskan RCI ditubuhkan di Sabah.

    ReplyDelete
  5. dgr2 kabar SPR telah bersetuju untuk menggunakan dakwat kekal untuk piliharaya nnti.

    ReplyDelete
  6. samada guna sistem biometrik atau dakwat kekal, keadaan akan tetap sama jika pihak yang diamanahkan untuk menjalankan proses pilihanraya ini menyalahgunakan kuasa mereka.

    ReplyDelete
  7. semoga penambahbaikan pilihanraya dapat menghasilkan pilihanraya yang bersih dan adil.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Setuju dengan Anon. Penyalahgunaan kuasa membantutkan proses demmokrasi sistem pilihan raya.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dakwat kekal tersebut sudahpun dibeli, gunalah jangan bazir.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Harap SPR dan PSC akan berusaha memastikan pilihan raya akan berjalan dengan adil dan bersih.

    ReplyDelete
  11. harp PSC akan dapat menabahbaik sistem pilihanraya.

    ReplyDelete
  12. semoga penambahbaikan akan dapat dilakukan.

    ReplyDelete
  13. kenapa sapp tidak sambut baik saja keputusan spr mahu menggunakan dakwat kekal untuk pru13??

    ReplyDelete
  14. SPR telah mengatakan mereka akan melaksanakan dakwat kekal tapi dakwat kekal ini berbeza dengan apa yang digunakan pada PRU 2008.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Rasanya apa yang dikatakan SPR mengenai penggunaan dakwat kekal ini perlulah diterima baik. Dakwat baru ini telah pun dikaji oleh pihak yang dipertanggungjawabkan.

    ReplyDelete