Search This Blog
Friday, May 25, 2012
Star: One to one fight ideal, but not necessary
KOTA KINABALU: The State Reform Party (Star) shares the sentiments of the Democratic Action Party (Dap) that the possibility of one-to-one fights in Sabah to take on the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) at the forthcoming 13th General Election is non-existent.
However, Star begs to differ with the Peninsular Malaysia-based national opposition party on why “it’s not possible to strike a deal with the self-glorified and unrealistic Star”.
“We are not indulging in self-glorification or being unrealistic,” said Star vice chairman Dr Felix Chong, a Dap leader until recent days, in a prepared press statement. “It’s the people who are glorifying us everywhere including in FaceBook.”
He was referring to a statement by Kota Kinabalu MP and Dap Advisor in Sabah, Hiew King Cheu, in the local media on Thurs this week.
.
On Star being unrealistic as alleged by Dap, Chong pointed out that the campaign for a 3rd Force in the Malaysian Parliament was based on realpolitik.
He added that winning seats at the GE was not realpolitik but incidental and that the concept (realpolitik) must extend beyond and more importantly deal with the unresolved status of Sabah and Sarawak in the Malaysian Federation.
“We can’t talk about Sabah and Sarawak rights in the Malaysian Federation until the issue of the Federal Government’s non-compliance with the four constitutional documents and/or conventions governing our membership, participation and partnership in Malaysia is resolved,” said Chong.
He referred to the four documents as the 1963 Malaysia Agreement (MA63), 20/18 Points (20/18 P), the Inter Governmental Committee Report (IGCR) and the Cobbold Commission Report (CCR).
He claimed that the Federal Government’s “ominous silence” on the four documents rendered the Malaysian Constitution inoperable to the extent of its non-compliance with the said documents and thereby raised a fundamental issue of politics, the law and the Constitution: were Sabah and Sarawak in or out of the Federation?
If both states were in fact out of the Federation, continued Chong, why is Putrajaya carrying on otherwise since 1963 and more especially since Singapore’s expulsion in 1965? Are both states being occupied by Malaya?
If both states are still in the Federation, he stressed, what’s their legal and constitutional status in the face of the aforesaid non-compliance? Are they colonies of Malaya?
The Dap vice chairman does not want the Federal Government to admit its failure on the four documents “only after all our oil and gas resources have been plundered from us and we are pushed into a corner financially”.
These are serious issues that must be dealt with urgently, he said. “We are looking at the big picture and our longterm future, not the short-run or immediate run like the myopic parti parti Malaya in Sabah and Sarawak.”
Chong added that Dap like “the other parti parti Malaya in Sabah and Sarawak” are more focused on seizing control of Putrajaya from BN instead of being relevant to the struggle of the local people.
“We are not interested in regime change but system change,” said Chong. “Why should the people of Sabah and Sarawak go from the frying pan (BN) into the fire (Pakatan Rakyat) or, at best from the fire (BN) into the frying pan (PR)?”
He noted that PR leaders had often spoken about system change but the fact that they are openly against Star’s struggle for Sabah and Sarawak “shows that it’s either merely paying lip to system change and is focused on regime change or wants system change to be confined to Peninsular Malaysia”.
Chong warned Dap that it’s not good enough for PR to “bribe Sabah and Sarawak” with 20 per cent oil royalty in return for voting for them.
“What PR is saying is that they will steal less of our oil and gas resources compared with BN?” said Chong. “These resources belong to us 100 per cent. It’s like adding insult to injury if someone tries to bribe us into inaction with a fraction of our own money after stealing it.”
Besides dangling the 20 per cent oil royalty carrot-and-stick before the voters, the Star vice chairman hasn’t seen why the parti parti Malaya crossed over from the other side of the South China Sea.
In a dig at Hiew, Chong said that the people of Sabah and Sarawak were not interested in seeing all dolled up Dap leaders “self-glorifying” themselves in photo ops in the media “showing them pointing at an uncovered manhole, an unpaved road or at something floating in a longkang (drain).”
Asked whether the BN would win the next GE by default in Sabah and Sarawak in the absence of a seat-sharing pact among opposition parties to take on the ruling coalition one-to-one, Chong said that it was too simplistic to paint such a dismal picture.
For starters, even given an opposition seat-sharing pact, Chong claims that the BN would have a head start given the number of illegal immigrants -- "its electoral Fixed Deposits -- on the electoral rolls.
For another, he thinks that in principle “any form of pre-polls seat-sharing and /or coalitions is against the concept of democracy. By endorsing elite power-sharing, it denies the people meaningful participation in elections and thereby circumvents government of the people, by the people and for the people”.
Chong thinks that the only way for the people of Sabah and Sarawak to defeat the BN is to reject any political party involved in placing illegal immigrants on the electoral rolls, proxy politics of "the parti parti Malaya" and to vote on the basis of the issues before them.
“It doesn’t matter how many candidates enter the fray, “said Chong. “The issues and the number of issues will carry the day for Star and its 3rd Force allies in the United Borneo Alliance (UBA).”
A 3rd Force in the Malaysian Parliament is an idea whose time has come, said Chong. “It can steer evenly between PR and BN.”
He described the 3rd Force as a response to the “historical window of opportunity” opened up by the 12th General Election in 2008 when a political tsunami swept Peninsular Malaysia, deprived BN of its coveted two-third majority and threw up a two party system there.
“It would be foolish for us in Sabah and Sarawak to squander this historical window of opportunity and pander to the whims and fancies of the parti parti Malaya with their self-serving politics,” said Chong.
Both BN and PR, noted Chong, were Peninsular Malaysia-based national alliances/coalitions.
In response, believes Chong, Sabah and Sarawak need a Borneo-based national alliance in the Malaysian Parliament to lead a 3rd Force. “Such a Force is the best guarantee for Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia,” said Chong. “The issue of non-compliance can be resolved once and for all.”
Star chairman Jeffrey Kitingan announced in mid-April that the party would contest all 60 state seats in Sabah and 26 parliamentary seats including Labuan.
The party took the stand under its Plan Z after Sapp broke ranks with the UBA and entered into unilateral seat-sharing talks in Kota Kinabalu with de facto Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) chief Anwar Ibrahim who claimed to be speaking on behalf of PR. However, this was subsequently disputed by Dap in Sabah.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Joe Fernandez wrote in mid-Feb that Star would be going for all 60 state seats in Sabah and 26 parliamentary seats including Labuan. This was denied by Star and Sapp called Joe Fernandez a liar. In mid-April, Jeffrey Kitingan announced exactly what Joe Fernandez wrote in mid-Feb. He called it his Plan Z. Better to trust the journalists than politicians. Jeffrey knew that Joe wrote what the young leaders in his party had told him. Star used Joe to test the waters and then Jeffrey sacrificed him by denying the story just to see how Sapp would react. Why do this to Joe F? Jeffrey and Sapp should apologise to Joe F if they have even an ounce of decency and courtesy left in them. Why keep quiet and still carry the post ... STAR: Joe Fernandez is a LIAR. You mean Jeffrey and Sapp only speak the Gospel truth?
ReplyDeleteSTAR is BN trojan horse.
ReplyDeleteBN is nothing but old horse...
DeleteTO OVERCOME THE CORRUPT ELECTORAL SYSTEM- CONSIDER PREFERENTIAL VOTING SYSTEM
DeleteSee article on Australian system- where is it harder to cheat. The problem will be the ruling party will create dummy parties to capture preferences. This is similar to the many dummy parties which end up with BN. But the preferential system is still worthwhile to consider.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system_of_Australia
Australia uses various forms of preferential voting for almost all elections. Under this system, voters number the candidates on the ballot paper in the order of their preference.
The preferential system was introduced in 1918, in response to the rise of the Country Party, a party representing small farmers. The Country Party split the anti-Labor vote in conservative country areas, allowing Labor candidates to win on a minority vote. The conservative government of Billy Hughes introduced preferential voting as a means of allowing competition between the two conservative parties without putting seats at risk.
It was first used at the Corangamite by-election on 14 December 1918.[14][15] It had previously been introduced as a result of the work of Thomas Hare and Andrew Inglis Clark in the Tasmanian House of Assembly.
Preferential voting has gradually extended to both upper and lower houses, in the federal, state and territory legislatures, and is also used in municipal elections, and most other kinds of elections as well, such as internal political party elections, trade union elections, church elections, elections to company boards and elections in voluntary bodies such as football clubs.
Negotiations for disposition of preference recommendations to voters are taken very seriously by candidates because transferred preferences carry the same weight as primary votes. The federal Senate electoral system and those for some state legislatures now provide for simultaneous registration of party-listed candidates and party-determined orders of voting preference, known as 'group voting tickets'.
Under this system, voters can opt to either 'vote above the line' simply by placing the number '1' in a single box or to 'vote below the line' by numbering a large number of individual candidate's boxes in the order of their own preference. In the latter option, there is a risk that the vote will be declared invalid ('informal') if any number in the sequence is inadvertently duplicated or omitted. However, an estimated 95% of all votes are cast 'above the line',[16] meaning that the precise valuation of those votes is passed to the control of the party receiving the single primary vote.
The electoral authority automatically allocates preferences, or votes, in the predetermined order outlined in the group voting ticket. Each party or group can register up to three group voting tickets. This highly complex system has potential for unexpected outcomes[citation needed], including the possible election of a candidate who may have initially received an insignificant primary vote tally.
At some polling places in the Australian Capital Territory, voters may choose between voting electronically or on paper.[17] Otherwise, Australian elections are carried out using paper ballots.
The main elements[18] of the operation of preferential voting are as follows:
Voters are required to place the number "1" against the candidate of their choice, known as their "first preference".
Voters are then required to place the numbers "2", "3", etc., against all but one of the other candidates listed on the ballot paper, in order of preference.
Part 2 on PREFERENTAIL VOTING SYSTEM
DeleteThe counting of first preference votes, also known as the "primary vote", takes place first. If no candidate secures an absolute majority of primary votes, then the candidate with the fewest votes is "eliminated" from the count.
The ballot papers of the eliminated candidate are re-allocated amongst the remaining candidates according to the number "2", or "second preference" votes.
If no candidate has yet secured an absolute The counting of first preference votes, also known as the "primary vote", takes place first. If no candidate secures an absolute majority of primary votes, then the candidate with the fewest votes is "eliminated" from the count.
The ballot papers of the eliminated candidate are re-allocated amongst the remaining candidates according to the number "2", or "second preference" votes.
If no candidate has yet secured an absolute majority of the vote, then the next candidate(s) with the fewest primary votes is eliminated. This preference allocation continues until there is a candidate with an absolute majority. Where a second preference is expressed for a candidate who has already been eliminated, the voter's third or subsequent preferences are used.
Following the full allocation of preferences, it is possible to derive a two-party-preferred figure, where the votes are divided between the two main candidates in the election. In Australia, this is usually between the candidates from the two major parties.
Gerrymandering and malapportionment
majority of the vote, then the next candidate(s) with the fewest primary votes is eliminated. This preference allocation continues until there is a candidate with an absolute majority. Where a second preference is expressed for a candidate who has already been eliminated, the voter's third or subsequent preferences are used.
Following the full allocation of preferences, it is possible to derive a two-party-preferred figure, where the votes are divided between the two main candidates in the election. In Australia, this is usually between the candidates from the two major parties.
Gerrymandering and malapportionment
SEE MORE @: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system_of_Australia
Malaysians never have any admirations on everything Australians.So you Anon above can keep the idea to yourself in your thick head.
DeleteThe Electoral Commission will be appointing NGO and foreign observers to witness our electoral system during the next general election to show their transparency and fairness.
DeleteI don't think STAR is able to make something out of it.
Deletei don't think so...
DeleteLets see whether STAR can do well in coming election.
DeleteTo the ANON who posted PREFERENTAIL VOTING SYSTEM:
DeleteDamn, fool! can't you just summarize the bloody article...
Very obvious now STAR is BN agent to split votes
ReplyDeleteBN-UMNO is super agent of divide and rule to sabahan..
DeleteSTAR IS GATHERING SUPPORT BOTH FROM BN AND PR CAMP...
DeleteJangan
Deletesangka
kau
pandai
sangat
dgn
knyataan
cetek
mu
itu..Bongok
The opposition would split their own votes anyway as they could not cooperate to have a 1 on 1 fight against BN. BN will win again during the next general elections, Hidup BN!
DeleteI don't know much about STAR. All I know is that, STAR is a left over party in Sarawak, and then spread its wings to Sabah, to make a difference. Yet I didn't see anything.
Deletebukan salah BN jika undi pembangkang pecah...ianya adalah salah pembangkang itu sendiri yang terlalu bercita-cita tinggi, pentingkan diri dan gila kuasa..
DeleteIn Sabah politic, any small party had to become alliance to go against the big BN coalition. Any disagreement between SAPP, STAR & PR will only add advantage to BN. The main issues in Sabah were illegal immigrant and people being short change.
ReplyDeletePerennial issues in Sabah should be addressed well.
Deletetidak akan ada kerjasama di antara pembangkang untuk formula 1 lawan 1...BN sabah akan menang.
DeleteThe real devil are the parti2 Malaya who come to Sabah to colonise us by plundering the two Borneo states wealth and those Sabahan abeting them are nothing more than traitors, proxies and stooges.
ReplyDeleteOppositions are trying to split us apart. So what we want to say? After all, they like to do so.
Delete"Star Chon" ni butul macam bapa dia.Belum matang sudah pandai buat kritik.
ReplyDeleteBeliau bermimpi akan menjadi calun dan YB jika tidak percaya ko cuba tanya kawan-kawan sibapa tu?
Bapanya siapa?
Muka macam belacan tempura siapa mau undi?
DeleteTanya
Deletebapa
kaulah
bahlol...
Our hand has five fingers.
ReplyDeleteThey are not in equal length and sizes but have their merit and function.
They are in unity at all times and share the same feeling and sensitivity.
Meaning the word is “UNITY”.
“All in One and One in All”.
The leaders in Opposition Parties must be aware that all of you are like the fingers of the hand.
They are not in equal length and neither sizes nor they are equal strength.
If all fingers are united to form a grip or knuckle sandwiched or karate chops.
All of you can defeat or crash UMNO/BN in the General Election
Maximusial
ReplyDeleteselalu
tipu
undi
di
MP
K.M
inilah..itulah..hujanlah..tiada..pesawatlah..
tiada..bencana..alamlah..
sengaja..lambat2kan..hitung..undi..2008
padahal..tipu..saja..maximusial..
A DIRECT CHALLENGE TO STAR/SAPP/USNO, ETC,
ReplyDeleteAll you local politicians are stupid-stupid-stupid. All of you talk the same talk but never walk the same walk. Stop your bloody nonsense, picking and throwing stones at each other. A nation divided cannot stand but fall.
Our fore-fathers messed up by giving Sabah away. You guys are not making things any better but just giving more ammunition to BN/UMNO. I will fight for independence, but I cannot do it if I am the only one in the fox hole. Will you stand next to me or will you not.
A WARNING TO ALL TRAITORS (THOSE THAT STAND WITH BN)
Listen! You will never sleep easy for the rest of your life. Where ever you go, you will need to watch over your back. You took everything away from us and even now more then ever without remorse. You will be your own undoing. The wind of change is blowing and a storm is brewing. You are already deaf if you can't hear it!
This fella must be a new 'Hitler' in the making.He cannot win the hearts and minds of the people and now he is issuing threats.People who support the government thats elected democratically in a GE are traitors to him and he thinks he has every right to brand all sorts of names to people who do not support his party.What a desperate jerk!
DeleteAN ADVICE TO ALL SABAHANS.Listen!You will feel easy and calmness in your hearts of hearts if you stand and support UMNO/BN.You don't need to watch over your back when BN wins for you can always walk in peace and sit in harmony with people from all walks of life and creed.Thats what a BN government is and will continue to be with your continued support.Discard any doubts and ill-feelings planted by the opposition for they have shown themselves now how devilish they can be.Thats not a 'New Vision' Sabahans are looking for,that is going back into the archaic era of Hitlerism but a era of hope,peace and prosperity as envisioned by the BN government under Datuk Musa Aman.
This is a democratic country, if people wanted to support Pakatan Rakyat, that is their own freedom, but if people wanted to support BN, that is also their rights. Who are you to tell people who and how to vote. This sort of people are the ones who go against the true meaning of democracy and freedom of speech.
DeletePakatan Rakyat claims they wanted freedom of speech and democracy, that is all bullshit. They only wanted freedom of speech when it suits them. PAS fired Hassan Ali because they are afraid of what he can reveal about the party. DAP slammed Abdul Aziz because his ideology is different from the party? Is this what you call freedom of speech, Pakatan?
Deleteand BN-UMNO have no ball to do such move...
DeleteSo NEW VISSION:
DeleteI have to agree with ANAK PETAGAS, your commentssomewhat resembles that of Hitler.
what is your recommendation for the illegal immigrant issue? Our own version of the holocaust?
Dear Mr. Full of Gas
ReplyDeleteI do not need to win the hearts and minds of the people for it is the people that are searching in vain for change. What party of mine are you in referring to when I never even mentioned who I actually support? Now you tell me what hope, peace and prosperity are you on about when we've been raped and pillaged all these years. I suppose you live very much in comfort and not see or experience first hand the reality that is all around us. I agree that anarchy is not the solution nor did I ever mention for us to take up arms, but yet you label me as wanting to start a Nazi campaign. Everyone knows that there is no real democracy under the present government. Elected democratically! Yes, but with the help of the sudden naturalized foreigners. Don't say otherwise because you know very well that only crap will spew out from you. Perhaps I should have made it more clearer but my sincere apologies. The traitors are not those who vote for BN but those who gave away our rights. Again we know who they are. Lastly, your a waste of time so I won't bother responding to you again.
Point taken.
DeleteWell there are elements of intimidation. If you add a Pure Sabahan Race....then it'll be a DEAD ringer! LOL!
Sebelum ini Star katakan bahawa mereka sokong 100% pertandingan 1-ke-1, sekarang pula ubah fikiran bahawa pertandingan 1-ke-1 tidak mungkin berlaku? Cakap tak serupa bikin.
ReplyDeleteStar mahu tanding 26/60 di sabah...mana ada 1 lawan 1...mustahil..
DeleteI wonder what change their mind.
DeleteStar mmg tiada pendirian, begitulah bila dipimpin Jefferey c raja katak.
DeleteSatu lagi parti lalang. Hari ni cakap lain, besok cakap lain.
DeleteNow DAP is having doubt, I bet this won't work out at all.
ReplyDeleteNo opposition can win in Sabah..
DeleteFooled! Democracy in Malaysia is only on the surface. We in Sabah & Sarawak have never been free to willingly express our sufferings and setbacks. Even when we manage to let it be know, it gets completely played down and twisted. This is no longer about who we vote into power. This is about taking control of what was taken from us. This is about our future, our pride, our independence!
ReplyDeleteDamn...you need to see a shrink...so much anger...
DeleteStar hanya memecahkan undi pembangkang di Sabah
ReplyDeleteLagi besarlah peluang BN untuk menang.
DeleteMaybe that is what STAR wants.
Deletebukan salah BN jika undi pembangkang pecah...ianya adalah salah pembangkang itu sendiri yang terlalu bercita-cita tinggi, pentingkan diri dan gila kuasa..
ReplyDeleteKalau ada kerjasama di kalangan parti pembangkang tidak mustahil boleh mengalahkan BN. Tapi kalau dilihat keadaan sekarang, memang mustahil lah.
DeleteSTAR wants the power all for themselves. The oppositions could kiss their victory goodbye cuz BN will win for sure.
Deletepembangkang sendiri tidak bersatu, jadi memang sukar untuk mereka mendapat sokongan.
DeleteDAP sabah akan menjadi sejarah selepas pru13..
ReplyDeleteLebih baik tumpukan perjuangan di PP.
Delete"Star: One to one fight ideal, but not necessary"
ReplyDeleteI'm beginning to think that STAR is BN strategy to win the election.
I think STAR siok sendiri only.
Deletejika pertandingan byk penjuru berlaku, peluang pembangkang akan makin tipis.
ReplyDeleteTidak banyak penjuru pun pembangkang akan kalah.
Deletetidak hairan jika pertandingan 3 atau 4 penjuru akan berlaku.
DeleteWe will all have to wait and see the outcome of all these.
ReplyDeleteThe people have their right to support whosoever they desire.
ReplyDeleteThe people of Sabah need to be protected.
ReplyDeleteWhatever is planned…the end justifies the means.
ReplyDeleteThe people just have to be wise this time.
ReplyDeletePasti satu persaingan yang amat giat antara BN dan parti pembangkang.
ReplyDeletemungkin persaingan sengit akan berlaku sebab semua parti pun mahu menang...
DeleteSTAR masih baru, harus membuktikan keupayaan dan corak memimpinnya.
ReplyDeleteJika sanggup bekerjasama, pasti satu keadaan yang cerah sedikit untuk pembangkang.
ReplyDeletesetakat ini pembangkang masih lagi tidak bersatu.
DeleteRakyat harus memberi peluang dan bersikap positif kepada pembangkang. Sekian lama pembangkang berusaha, mungkin berkeupayaan memperjuangkan yang terbaik untuk rakyat?
ReplyDeleterasanya 1 lawan 1 memang tidak akan terjadi.
ReplyDeleteIf we give a chance to PR fight one vs one. I will make the opportunity for STAR and SAPP fight in Sabah will reduce. So it not the good way for local party. They have right to fight any place they want.
ReplyDeleteStar bilang, malaya parti perlu balik malaya.. saya pula bilang, sarawak parti perlu balik sarawak..
ReplyDeletekalau pembangkang Sabah kalah lagi selepas PRU13, jangan salahkan BN atau rakyat.. salahkan saja ketua2 parti pembangkang di Sabah kerana bersikap tamaha.. masing2 mangidam jawatan KM sabah..
ReplyDelete