Search This Blog
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Govt must subsidise transport to Sabah
The federal government must provide proof that freight charges have no impact on the price of consumer goods in Sabah.
TAWAU, July 9, 2012: The federal government must subsidise trans-shipment of goods to Sabah in order to standardise the prices of consumer goods in the state with that in Peninsular Malaysia.
Tawau MP Chua Soon Bui said talks have been going on for years with no solution in sight while consumers have been forced to cough up more money for goods that are cheaper in the peninsula.
"If the federal government can afford to subsidise the toll charges on federal highways for billions of ringgits, there's no reason why the same cannot be done for transport to Sabah as a result of the cabotage policy," she said over the weekend.
She said such a move was only appropriate and fair to the people of Sabah since the federal government had until today refused to abolish the cabotage policy which had resulted in a high-cost of doing business and living in Sabah.
Chua said the people of Sabah are being grossly shortchanged by the federal government despite the fact that Sabah is contributing significantly to the federal coffers through its oil and gas resources since 1976.
On the Transport Ministry's rejection that the price difference between Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah is due to the cabotage policy, she said the ministry must provide proof that freight charges have no impact on the price of consumer goods in Sabah.
Chua also admonished fellow Sabah MP Abdul Rahim Bakri for dismissing the cabotage policy as a non-issue.
She described Abdul Rahim's remark in Parliament last month in his capacity as the deputy transport minister that the issue was merely being "played up" by certain quarters, as inconsiderate and an insult to the people of Sabah.
"As a Sabahan himself, Abdul Rahim, who is the MP for Kudat, should realise that the cabotage policy is a real and pressing issue which has been the underlying cause for the high consumer goods prices, thus contributing to a high cost of living in Sabah since the policy was introduced in 1980," she said.
The cabotage policy is seen as the main cause of inflation in Sabah, with the business sector arguing that the federal policy has contributed to the high cost of doing business in the state.
The business community in Sabah, especially those in the manufacturing industry, has repeatedly denounced the policy as anti-business and has made a series of calls through the Federation of Sabah Manufacturers (FSM) for its revocation.
"I am disappointed that the federal government has no intention at all to address the high transport cost faced by Sabah and Sarawak business sectors.
Chua, who is also a vice-president of the Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), said the government was playing with words when it announced that the cabotage policy has been liberalised.
The transport ministry claims that foreign cargo vessels can ship directly to Sabah, but at the same time says that containers once unpacked cannot be re-shipped to Sabah on foreign vessels.
Also under the current system, cargo unloaded at Sepangar Port must then be reloaded and transported by other means to the east coast thus inevitably raising the cost of goods.
"Why must foreign cargo vessels which arrive at Sepangar Port be prohibited from proceeding to Sandakan, Lahad Datu and Tawau?" Chua asked.
Chua said the federal government should explain how the monopolistic policy had benefited local industries because up to now it has been been evasive on the issue.
By Azman Habu
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
HOW ABOUT DE-COLONIZING SABAH- THAT WOULD GOOD START!
ReplyDeleteDO WE HAVE TO BEG FOR MONEY MALAYA HAS STOLEN FROM US???
DO THEY STEAL OUR MONEY & MAKE US BEG FOR IT?
Sabahans if Sabah is independent, all the Malayan colonial policies, unfair taxes and plunder of our oil and other resources will stop.
This means all the wealth remains in Sabah and we don't need to beg the colonial master for what belongs to us!
This is a very simple logic which ou
Independence for Sabah!
I suggest you to contest in this coming GE.
DeleteHahaha- why bother?
DeleteISN'T IT SO OUTRAGEOUS? SABAH PRODUCES OIL & THEY SELL IT BACK TO US AT A HIGH PRICE?
ReplyDeleteGuess whose companies own the distribution rights & contracts? Mahathir & cronies.
http://wikisabah.blogspot.com/2012/02/some-lies-for-bn-to-answer.html
http://wikisabah.blogspot.com/2011/03/root-causes-of-poverty-in-sabah-sarawak.html
http://wikisabah.blogspot.com/2012/05/star-dares-sabah-cm-to-debate-on.html
ALL THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BEING IN MALAYSIA ARE SPELT OUT IN THE ABOVE ARTICLES.
READERS WILL BE SURPRISED TO FIND OUT THERE ARE NOT EVEN ONE ADVANTAGE
TO BE IN MALAYSIA FOR SABAH & SARAWAK AT ALL!
THE ONLY PARTY TO BENEFIT IS MALAYA & UMNO....
SORRY NO PRIZE FOR GUESSING RIGHT BUT YOU GAINED THE ADVANTAGE OF NEW KNOWLEDGE IF YOU HAVE NOT AWAKENED TO ALL THESE NONSENSE WE GET OUT OF BEING IN MALAYSIA.
THE ONLY WAY TO STOP THIS IS TO GET SABAH OUT OF MALAYSIA!
SABAH SARAWAK KELUAR MALAYSIA!
Sabahan leaders should be more vocal to protect our rights.
DeletePetronas bakal menubuhkan pusat latihan untuk rakyat tempatan dalam sektor gas dan minyak, semoga selepas rakyat Sabah menguasai cara memproses minyak dan gas, Sabah boleh mengawal sumber minyak dan gas sendiri tanpa bergantung pada Syarikat Semenanjung.
Delete1Malaysia = 1Harga
ReplyDeleteBetul, kita menggunakan mata wang yang sama, tapi kenapa kos kehidupan di Sabah, Sarawak dan Semenanjung jauh berbeza? Mestlah diselaraskan sehingga menjadi sama.
DeleteSaya setuju sangat, satu malaysia satu harga, kenapa ini tidak boleh di implementasikan?
Deleteharga barangan dan kos hidup di Sabah dgn negeri2 lain seharusnya sama. jgnlah ada jurang harga.
DeleteCabotage harus dimansuhkan.
DeleteHarap barang harus diseragamkan. kenapa pula orang Sabahan perlu membeli barang yang lebih mahal tetapi gaji lebih rendah?
DeleteMungkin sudah tiba bah isu cabotage ini di beri perhatian.
DeleteTidak adillah kalau ada perbezaan yang ketara antara SM, Sabah & Sarawak.
Deleteharap kerajaan akan melakukan apa yang perlu dalam pekara ini.
DeleteIyaya...YB Ah Moi your same sirname Ah Chua CD said like Penang port Sabah port or shipment just to be a feeder port ma!
ReplyDeleteNo wonder Sabah always lose out thus becoming poorer and poorer with this type of Tailo in BN!
So you know what to do to support 1215 for next GRE bah!
itu lah orang sabah BN kasi gaji minimum RM 800.00 pun sudah bertempik sorak sedangkan disemananjung gaji minimumnya RM 900.00,memang lah kita disabah ini kena bodoh oleh BN,seperti kata-kata YB Liawan Sairin Karno harga getah RM 4.20 pun YB ini kata orang sabah sudah beruntung sedangkan harga di semananjung masih lagi berharga RM 10.80,betapa pemimpin BN ini membodohkan rakyaat Liawan
ReplyDeleteKita tengoklah sama ada polisi gaji minima ini diterima baik oleh majikan di Sabah terlebih dahulu. Jika mereka rasa terlalu tinggi gaji ini untuk sesetengah pekerjaan, mugkin ramai pekerja yang akan kehilangan kerja nanti.
DeleteBut i think there will be a light at the end of the tunnel when Datuk Musa recently make a statement that need a further discuss the request by employers for ample time to adjust to the minimum wage policy. There are some argument that due to the high cost of living in Sabah, employees in sabah should get a higher minimum wage. But we should also think about the employers. Both must end up with win2 situation. We should also consider on the other things. not only to look only 1 side.
DeletePolisi gaji yang di umumkan oleh kerajaan sudah cukup bagus..Mungkin akan di umumkan lagi penambahannya nanti.. Jangan terlalu ikut perasaan.
DeleteBAH, SAIRIN BILA LAGI KO MAU BELANJA, SEKARANG KO KAYA SUDAH... ari-ari sia tinguk ko sia macam makin jauh...
ReplyDeleteSubsidi harus diberi pada sasaran pengguna yang tepat.
ReplyDeleteHarga barangan di Sabah dan Sarawak perlulah diselaraskan dengan harga barangan di Semananjung.
DeleteSubsidy yang tidak kawal akan membawa kesan sampingan kepada kerajaan.
DeleteBetul kata Anonymous, salauran harus sampai ke tangan tepat kepada orang dan masa.
Deletesubsidi tu kelihatan hanya dinikmati oleh pihak2 tertentu. ada yang seludup barang pula ke luar negara untuk kaut keuntungan.
Deletepastikan pemberian subsidi sampai pada pengguna sasaran.
DeleteHopefully the Federal Government will give evidence that the freight charge will not affect the prices of goods in Sabah and Sarawak.
ReplyDeletedasar kabotaj dikatakan punca harga barangan di Sabah tinggi. dasar ini harus dikaji semula.
ReplyDeleteSubsidy yang berpatutan adalah baik juga untuk mengurangkan beban.
ReplyDeleteIni adalah berita baik kepada rakyat.
Deleteada pula yang kata subsidi ni perlu dikurangkan sedikit demi sedikit supaya rakyat tidak bergantung dgn kerajaan.
Deleteyang penting ianya memberikan manfaat kepada rakyat.
DeleteHarga runcit dan barangan harus "standardise".
ReplyDeleteKerajaan negeri harus memperjuangkan yang terbaik untuk rakyat khas beban kehidupan semakin bertambah.
ReplyDeleteSubsidy yang bertambahan cuma membebankan sahaja.
ReplyDeleteJangan pula mensia-siakan subsidy kerajaan, harus diguna dengan sebaiknya.
ReplyDeleteHarga barang di sabah perlu di selaraskan dengan SM...
ReplyDeletemungkin juga pekara ini akan dipertimbangkan.
ReplyDeletebanyak pekara yang perlu diambilkira. apa pun, keperluan rakyat harus jadi keutamaan semua.
ReplyDeletePerbezaan yang berlaku dengan harga di Sabah dan Semenanjung sememangnya perlulah dikaji sebaiknya.
ReplyDeleteJika boleh pastikan harga di Sabah ini dapat diseleraskan dengan harga di tempat yang lain. Perbezaan ini amat ketara untuk Sabah.
ReplyDeleteSabah ni luas.. bagus manfaatkan saja keluasan Sabah ni untuk bina lebih banyak kilang2 makanan, pakaian atau sebagainya yang boleh dikeluarkan di negeri ini.. bila lagi mahu jadi negeri pengimport/pengeluar..
ReplyDeleteA good information help to take a good decision.Thanks for your informative post. It’s really helpful for careers.Accountant Jobs
ReplyDelete