Search This Blog

Monday, August 6, 2012

BN government treat EPF as their kitty.


The government's bid to increase the full EPF withdrawal age to 60 years has rekindled memories of the Mahathir era - Awang Abdillah

I am worried about our Employees Provident Fund (EPF) monies. The recent statement by Deputy Finance Minister Donald Lim who said that the age for full withdrawal from the EPF by contributors will be raised to 60 is bothering me and many others as well.

It means that the government needs more money and as always EPF is its kitty.

As at June 2010, the total savings deposited by millions of employees and their employers stood at RM407 billion.

The EPF has become the main source of domestic borrowings by the federal government.

But over the years the role of the EPF as the primary lender to the government has been grossly abused.
Here’s a reminder of the abuses by Umno’s political masters since 1981.

Former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad used EPF funds to finance the nation’s mega public projects.
Mahathir believed that Malaysia could achieve developed status and be at par with the Western economies through his mega economics doctrine.

Under the Mahathir’s “mega economic” models, projects and supplies worth billions were awarded directly to cronies and henchmen.

These projects were priced above the standard costs and the extra monies then went into the pockets of Umno (in the peninsula) and PBB (in Sarawak) stalwarts and coalition loyalists.
EPF buffer for Mahathir
This was Mahathir’s fatal mistake. For more than a decade, these funds were used to top up the annual deficit expenditures in the national budgets.
Upon investigations it was found that the deficit expenditures incurred were substantial due to the mark-up costs of public projects awarded to Umno and PBB cronies without the open tender system.

Hence a big chunk – to the tune of billions of ringgit annually – was borrowed from EPF for extra payments to Umno and PBB crony companies.

After the 1997-98 economic crisis that hit the nation badly, it was the EPF funds that were used to bail out crony companies.

Almost all of the crony companies suffered mammoth financial losses due to the fall in the ringgit value vis-à-vis the major world currencies and the loss in the value of the stocks from the KLSE crash.

What was worse , EPF funds were also used to prop up the shares of companies in which the powers-that-be had vested interests but this too burned out because the mega players involved were foreign “investors” (I call them gamblers).

Unlike in commercial banks the occurrence of bad loans did not result in “credit control” or freeze.
Because for the EPF the cash inflows from the employees and employers’ contributions and cash outflows from their withdrawals and loans taken by the government are a continuous non-stop process.

In other words, whatever and however much funds are used up, it will be continuously replenished by the new inflows from contributors.

Umno-BN secretive

Hence, EPF funds can be siphoned out or “stolen” without anyone noticing because the continued replenishing by the members’ monthly contributions creates the illusion that there is nothing wrong with the workers’ money deposited with the EPF.

It is also why to date no one really knows the total outflows and how are the funds utilised, especially those related to government borrowings for public investments/expenditures and for bailout purposes.
Also the Umno government has never until now disclosed how much EPF incurred in losses trying to prop up share prices in the equity market.

Hence the annual dividends paid by the EPF to the employees’ savings accounts may not be profits/revenue generated from the investments by the government at all.

The dividends paid are believed to come from the continuous workers and employers’ monthly contributions.
In which case, why are we even allowing them to continue “lending” the government our money?

Awang Abdillah is a political analyst, writer and FMT columnist

47 comments:

  1. What is more scary, EPF is a BIG player in local equity market, pushing prices up to even 60 times its intrinsic value.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know EPF is really a strong organization where it bought a building in London.

      Delete
    2. Isu ini seharusnya diselesaikan. EPF seharusnya dilindungi kerana ini merupakan simpanan pekerja untuk masa hadapan.

      Delete
  2. Ada pros dan juga cons, umur ditingkatkan untuk pengeluaran EPF. Namun, sebaiknya utamakan apa yang rakyat mahukan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diharapkan kerajaan akan membuat keputusan yang terbaik untuk para pesara.

      Delete
    2. Apa yg dirisaukan, bolehkah umur pelabur epf mencapai 60 tahun, kerana umur seseorang pada masa sekarang semakin pendek disebabkan kesihatan.alasan utama kerajaan sekarang, pekerja swasta akan mengalami masalah kewangan disebabkan jumlah epf yang terkumpul tidak mencukupi. Apakan tindakan kerajaan berbuat demikian betul atau tidak punyai jalan lain agar memastikan rakyat bila tiba umur 55 tahun? Ini bermakna kerajaan sekarang tidak mampu menangani masalah persaraan pekerja swasta.

      Delete
    3. bagus rakyat diberikan pilihan...itu lebih adil bagi pencarum..

      Delete
    4. Bagi saya, apa yang penting ialah kita dapat apa yang kita mampu.

      Delete
    5. Kenapa perlu bebankan pelabur dengan isu ini? Bagi pilihan, end of story.

      Delete
    6. bagi pilihan samada nak keluarkan ada usia 55 atau 60 tahun.

      Delete
    7. Betul tu, lebih baik jika pencarum di beri pilihan.

      Delete
  3. Sekurang-kurangnya terbukti juga slogan 1Malaysia tu:)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jadi yang ini apa cerita? Penjelasan lebih lanjut patut diberi bagi mengelakkan salah faham.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Betul kita perlukan penjelasan yang terang agar tdak ada kekeliruan lagi.

      Delete
    2. penjelasan lebih lanjut dan terperinci perlu diberikan..

      Delete
    3. This should be explained soon.

      Delete
    4. sebelum ini penjelasan sudah diberikan, tapi orang lebih suka sensasikan isu ini.

      Delete
    5. Entah. Confirm sudah ka 60 tahun baru boleh kasi keluar atau masih dalam perbincangan?

      Delete
    6. Penjelasan perlu di beri agar rakyat tidak terkeliru..

      Delete
  5. Pasti ramai juga yang panas bila baca hal ini.. Hairan kalau hal ni betul, entah apa yang akan jadi nanti.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diharapkan keputusan kerajaan ini betul-betul demi kebaikan rakyat.

      Delete
    2. maklum balas dari rakyat harus diterima dan dipertimbangkan kerana ianya melibatkan hak dan kepentingan rakyat...lebih2 lagi ianya adalah wang rakyat...

      Delete
    3. Isu ini harus diselesaikan secara baik.

      Delete
  6. Apapun, sama-sama kita menilai hal ini secara matang supaya tak dipengaruhi emosi.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Whatever the G do, must be for the good of the people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Find a win-win solution.

      Delete
    2. Sokong, takkn lah kerajaan mau menyusahkan rakyat, pasti apa yang kerajaan buat untuk kebaikan rakyat juga.

      Delete
  8. Some people manipulate the real information!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ya, ada pihak yang suka memanipulasikan sesuatu pekara.

      Delete
    2. Memang betul rakyat amat ragu-ragu dengan tindakan Kerajaan BN guna wang simpanan mereka untuk projek2 besar yang tidak memberi manfaat.

      Delete
  9. What is important, suara rakyat didengar dan didahulukan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rakyat perlulah didahulukan dalam semua keputusan kerajaan.

      Delete
    2. Praktikkan slogan 1Malaysia, baru efektif.

      Delete
    3. Kerajaan pasti tahu apa yang mereka buat, dan pasti suara rakyat akan di dengar terlebih dahulu.

      Delete
  10. Moga2lah boleh sampai usia 60 tahun tu. kalau tidak, dermakan saja..halalkan

    ReplyDelete
  11. The government must take the people's views and feedback before implementing any new policies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Saudara-saudara dan Saudari-saudari Yang Di Hormati
    Bahawa MCA Gombak pegurusi YIP KUM FOOK dan anaknya Yip Jiun Hann (Permuda MCA Gombak) bukan sahaja menggunakan kuasanya menghisap wang KUIL BUDDHA SAMNAK SAMBODHI(Thai) No: 19 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tetapi lebih dahsyat, ialah menipu wanita-wanita dan merosakan keluarga orang lain. Mereka sebenar-benarnya orang yang jahat dan tak bermoral

    Saya mengemukakan kesal yang benar ini, tujuan ialah harap orang ramai, khasnya wanita dapat mengambil perhatian supaya jangan terjerat oleh manis-manis mulutnya akhir akan meninpa kerugian dan kesakitan yang besar

    马华公会鹅唛區会主席叶金福律师与马华公会鹅唛區会叶君瀚青年圑長, 不但无耻的利用KUIL BUDDHA SAMNAK SAMBODHI(Thai) No: 19 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.宗教之名捞取权和私利之外, 叧一大罪悪是, 他们仗着权势, 甜言蜜語, 誘骗良家少女, 骗财骗色, 三妻四妾, 破坏别人的家庭. 父子两人, 无悪不做, 实是大色狼, 大老千,缺德的败娄.

    今天我把实事公告大家, 是希望公众, 特别是良家少女, 要多多小心, 提防这一娄假面具的佛教徒, 以免一失足成千古恨.

    Brother And Sister Of the respectfully
    That YIP KUM FOOK, MCA Gombak chairman and his son Yip Jiun Hann (Youth MCA Gombak) they are not only used of power to suck Temple’s money of SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST TEMPLE(Thai) No: 19 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. But far worse, they are cheating women and make people family broken. They truly wicked and immoral

    Bring forward. I regret that this is true, the purpose is to hope for public, and especially women take care not to be trapped by the end of sweet mouth will override of great loss and pain

    ReplyDelete
  13. macam2 isu ditimbulkan, sedangkan sebelum sesuatu dibuat ia pasti akan pertimbangkan semua pekara.

    ReplyDelete
  14. kadang-kadang ada sesetengah isu yang sengaja untuk disensasikan.

    ReplyDelete
  15. penjelasan sudah dibuat sebenarnya tapi, maklumlah ada yang buat-buat tidak faham.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sengaja ia dimanipulasi untuk kelirukan rakyat.

      Delete
  16. Give options to the EPF contributors. It is their money by the way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sepatutnya isu ini jangan di sensasikan dan tidak perlu di politikkan.

      Delete
    2. Sesetengah pihak memang gemar sensasikan isu EPF untuk menarik perhatian rakyat.

      Delete
  17. Isu EPF semakin sengaja diapi-apikan oleh pembangkang yang hanya mahu memburukan kerajaan.

    ReplyDelete