Sabah oil and gas contractors are proposing that an institution be set up to protect the industry in the state.
“We should not be asking for the royalty or the (oil) blocks… that’s secondary. We should be asking that for every ringgit taken from our oil revenue, at least 50 sen or 30 sen be given back to us, either directly or indirectly. That would be much fairer,” said Iskandar Malik, its president.
He also mocked local leaders for believing they had accomplished something important and triumphantly proclaiming to the media as though it was a coup whenever Petronas announced that it was giving some huge projects to Sabah.
Iskandar explained that this is because in one way or other, Petronas would still make its money out of Sabah people.
He said the fact remained that on average, the people of Sabah are spending about RM180 million per month on oil and gas based on a conservative estimate that some two million consumers in the state are spending an average of RM3 per day either on electricity consumption or on gas for transport and other use.
“In other words, we in Sabah are actually buying back our own oil and gas at RM2 billion a year. Hence it is only fair that Petronas should award the contracts to us directly, and not through other channels like the middle men or so-called foreign experts,” he said.
Noting that that the truth of the oil and gas business lies in the number of barrels of oil the state produces daily, Iskandar questioned how many barrels were Sabahans allowed to sell directly as traders.
“Not even one drop of it. That’s the sad truth,” he said, adding that Sabah currently produces 200,000 barrels of oil daily.
He also reminded that Sabah’s existing 2.3 billion barrels of oil reserve is expected to last “a very short period” of 43 years.
O&G institution needed
But with such valuable resources, Sabah should not be poorer than the other Malaysian states which do not possess much natural resources, he added.
Iskandar proposed that an institution be set up to act as the “official spokesman” for the state government on the oil and gas industry.
This would save the state government from continuous embarrassment stemming from the unprofessional statements made by some state leaders and politicians, he said.
He added that with such an institution, state leaders in future would not end up a laughing stock whenever they made statements or comments on the industry.
He was commenting on the penchant of Sabah politicians, from both sides of the divide, to comment on the thorny oil royalty issue which had been troubling the state ever since former chief minister Harris Salleh signed over Sabah’s oil and gas wealth to Petronas in 1976.
Sounds like a good idea from the SOGCA, hopefully an institution to protect the oil and gas industry will be set up.
ReplyDeleteSaya sangat suka idea ini dan menyokong penuh jika ia dilaksanakan.
Deletecadangan yang baik pasti akan dipertimbangkan.
Deletewill Petronas consider and accept this proposal?
DeletePoliticians from both sides should be clear of what Sabahans actually needed and what exactly is the best move for them.
ReplyDeleteleaders need to think it thoroughly and logically before opening suggesting something.
DeleteLeaders should stop making promises that they couldn't fulfil.
Deleteyup. don't just use it as political tools.
DeleteGood suggestion to have 50 sen from every 1 Ringgit that was earned by Petronas.
ReplyDeletei think this is more fairer to sabahan..
DeleteYa, ini lebih adil kepada rakyat sabah.
Deletecadangan ini boleh dipertimbangkan.
DeleteLets see what Petronas will respond to these.
DeleteBetul Elena. Ini baru diperingkat cadangan, entah apa respon petronas pula.
Deletetunggu dan lihat apa reaksi petronas berhubung dengan cadangan ini.
Delete50 sen from 1 Ringgit means that Petronas should give Sabah 50% from the oil and gas revenue. but i was thinking, when will this claim could be fulfilled by Petronas.
DeleteSo petronas need to review this.. 50 sen for per RM1 to Sabah.
DeleteLooks like not many people actually understands what is the oil and gas industry all about. An institution will be good to explain things to the public.
ReplyDeleteYes, it would be good to have this institution to explain the industry's affairs to the people.
DeleteAnother tough decision to make. We wants all the positive's impact goes to both side.
ReplyDeleteSelalunya, 'win-win situation' la yang paling sukar dicapai. Tapi tak mengapa, teruskan berusaha kerana usaha itu adalah tangga kejayaan.
Deleteya..yang penting sebarang pekara yang dibuat perlulah menguntungkn semua pihak.
DeleteFind as many solution to this matter and choose the 1 which is the best among others.
ReplyDeleteHopefully the best solution can give many benefits to Sabah.
Deletememang pun banyak penyelesaian namun persoalannya bukan pada jalan penyelesaian..tetapi pada kesanggupan mahu atau tidak...biarpun 1000 penyelesaian diberikan, tapi kalau tidak diambil berat oleh pihak berkenaan, tiada gunanya..
DeleteBukan senang untuk puaskan hati semua pihak, harap akan ada jalan penyelesaian yang dapat memuaskan hati semua pihak.
Deleteya..berusahalah untuk mencri penyelesaian terbaik untuk semua.
DeletePetroleum Act should be reviewed to ensure that it is still relevant or not with this current situation.
DeleteKalau tu menguntungkan Sabah mungkin kena dipertimbangkan.
ReplyDeletememang menguntungkan sabah..apa pula respon dari Petronas?
DeleteHarap Petronas akan mengambil perhatian tentang hal ini, tidak di nafikan petronas telah banyak membantu untuk menaikkan ekonomi sabah.
Deletei think it is more fairer to sabah...
ReplyDeleteleaders of sabah should fight for it...
ReplyDeletebut unfortunately our "brilliant" opposition leaders including PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had reportedly said he would increase Sabah's oil royalty from five to 20 per cent, while Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan went even further by promising 50 per cent. If this happens the allocation for the ministries meant for Sabah will be reduced.
DeleteIf it reduced or worse not given any allocation, then what will happen to sabah if the oil eventually run out?
DeleteI guess the leaders didn't think it thoroughly when announced their promises to the people.
Deletei saw that some of the leaders only use this issue as a political tool.
Deletemungkin negeri2 pengeluar minyak di malaysia patut diberi subsidi minyak dan gas yang lebih tinggi berbanding dengan negeri2 bukan pengeluar minyak..
ReplyDeleteItu yang sepatutnya dilakukan dari dulu lagi.
DeleteHarap cadangan ini dapat di pertimbangkan.Rasanya memang adil untuk rakyat sabah.
ReplyDeleteapapun, buatlah keputusan yang memberi manfaat kepada Sabah dan persekutuan.
DeleteApa2 pun kita harap Sabah akan jadi sebuah Negeri yang semakin maju pada masa hadapan.
ReplyDeleteI don't think this is possible.
ReplyDeleteMe too. It's hard to make them keep this promise.
Delete50 sen apa pula?
ReplyDeleteSabah deserve to have more. The state government should responsible to strike the best for the people.
ReplyDeleteNo harm to voice out the concern, just wait for the respective department to analyse and make decision.
ReplyDeleteAny suggestion that benefit the people should take into the consideration.
ReplyDeleteLoyalty yang Sabah dapat telah berkekalan selama 30 tahun dengan jumlah yang sama, seharus juga membuat penilaian adakah jumlah tersebut harus diperbaiki lagi?
ReplyDeleteCadangan sahaja, tidak salah untuk membuat cadangan, semua cadangan harus dikaji dengan teliti.
ReplyDeleteIni memang baik untuk mempertingkatkan pendapatan negeri untuk perkembangan yang berlanjutan.
ReplyDeletePeluang baik ga bagi orang sendiri.
DeleteMay be Petronas should come with proper and ideal proposal to resolve the issue about loyalties.
ReplyDeleteLets see whether Petronas will respond to the suggestion?
ReplyDeleteKerajaan negeri harus bersuara untuk rakyat, loyalty yang ketinggalan 30 tahun harus diperbaiki lagi.
ReplyDeletethe rate of oil royalty should definitely be revised
DeleteAgreement was made by human and can be revised by human.
DeleteThe oil and gas industry is a great asset in Sabah and should be protected by all means
ReplyDeleteI suppose the people of Sabah would agree that action speaks louder than mere words….let it be done!
ReplyDeleteAt least this will provide job opportunities to the locals in Sabah.
ReplyDeleteand thus will decrease the unemployment rate in sabah.
DeleteAt least I could say.
DeleteSabahans deserves it.
DeleteIf the institution is to protect the industry in the state, then let it be set up as proposed.
ReplyDeleteIt is a good suggestion as long as it becomes beneficial to the people.
ReplyDeleteHope it will be granted.
DeleteSOGCA has proposed a good suggestion. I think this is more logical than the opposition's idea.
ReplyDeleteYa, lebih logik dan praktikal:)
DeleteI agree with Iskandar proposal in setting up an institution to act as the “official spokesman” for the state government on the oil and gas industry. This would greatly help the state leaders by avoiding them becoming a laughing stock whenever they made statements or comments on the industry.
ReplyDeleteSemoga cadangan ini dipertimbangkan demi kebaikan bersama.
ReplyDeletesebarng cadangn perlu dipertimbangkan..yang penting setiap yang dibuat membawa manfaat kepada semua.
ReplyDeleteMungkin 50 sen setiap RM1 dari hasil minyak itu baik kepada Sabah. Namun perlu juga dikaji semula mengenai perkara ini. Jika petronas tidak dapat menutup kos perlaksanaan mungkin ini tidak patut dilaksanakan. Ini akan menjejaskan usaha carigali oleh petronas.
ReplyDeleteI don't think they would make this promise.
ReplyDelete