Search This Blog

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Villagers slam MP for not standing up for them

Luke Rintod

In Sabah, villagers' land applications are just recorded but never approved, says a village spokesman.


KOTA KINABALU: Villagers from Kota Marudu who opened up agriculture lands in nearby Beluran more than 20 year ago at the behest of the government have been chased out three times by the Sabah Forestry Department.


Infuriated villagers are now venting their frustration on the state Umno-led Barisan National government, and especially their MP, Dr Maximus Ongkili, for not standing up for their rights.


Spokesman for the group of 150 affected families, Jaipin Mohigal, said they started opening up agriculture lands in the area in 1989 and soon after applied for titles for the 1,500 acres of land in Kampung Koiboton .

“But as is the usual case in Sabah, the villagers’ land applications were only recorded but never approved.

“This despite years of hard work and toiling the land in planting rubber trees and other fruit trees,” said Mohigal.

Mohigal, 61, said by virtue of the many years they had toiled and lived in the area, they had established native customary rights (NCR) over the land.

They even had burial sites on the land. But despite this, they have been chased out of their homes and cultivated lands three times.

“We expected the Sabah government to help us, instead they burnt our houses,” he said when met by FMT here.

“The first time was on Oct 3, 2006, during the Muslim fasting month when forestry officers came while we were away in Kota Marudu to buy our food stocks.

“They burnt down 33 houses and poisoned our young rubber trees.

“This was most shocking. We didn’t know Sabah officers would dare do this kind of thing against the natives,” said Mohigal.

Musa protecting Forestry Department

According to old news reports, the Forestry Department director had said those razed houses were merely huts and not houses.

But the villagers claimed otherwise and showed pictures of their houses.

Their case was even highlighted on television.

But no compensation was ever given to them. The villagers did not even receive an apology.

The state government under Chief Minister Musa Aman went ahead to support the Forestry Department’s swift action in “protecting” (from villagers but not from companies) Sabah’s forest reserves.

Kampung Koiboton is adjacent to the Paitan Second Class Forest Reserve.

Mohigal, who is a father of nine, said soon after the first incident, the natives regrouped and rebuilt their houses as they felt they had established NCR over the land.

“During the 2008 general election, Ongkili promised us that our case was his utmost priority.

Mohigal pointed out that Ongkili had said: “Please vote for me, your problem is my goal (to resolve)…”

“But after he won, he never cared to meet and hear us anymore. His people around him were telling us not to bother their boss as our case was not under his jurisdiction (as the incident happened in nearby Beluran district).

“Beluran MP is Ronald Kiandee but he has been quiet on this issue,” Mohigal said .

Better support for companies

What irked Mohigal more was when the forestry officers entered a forest reserve area.

Mohigal said the Beluran district office had informed them (the villagers) they were applying for state land in the Koiboton areas for agriculture purpose.

“We went there in 1989, but sometime in 2000 when Yong Teck Lee was the chief minister, an FMU (Forestry Management Unit ) was said to have been approved for large areas including our areas.

“But who came first? Us or the company?” asked Mohigal, who claimed he heard land surveys are still being carried out, sometimes with the aid of a helicopter.

According to Mohigal, in 2007 the forestry officers came again to Koiboton and for the second time they destroyed their houses, using chainsaws.

“Luckily we exercised restraint and maintained peace… God knows what could happen in other countries…
“We went to Ongkili for help but all he told us was to make sure he won in 2008, and that it was his goal to resolve our land problems, which was never the case till now…” he said.

No leader supportive

Helpless Mohigal, who ironically is Ongkili’s neighbour in Kampung Bunsadan, Kota Marudu, together with the others, rebuilt their houses in Koiboton but was met with another “chainsaw incident” last year.

“This time, even the house of a son of the state assemblywoman of Tandek, Anita Baranting, who is a strong supporter of Ongkili, was among the victims of the brute action of the Forestry Department,” he said.

Together with two others (one had since died), Mohigal went to the High Court last year but in the end he was told by the court that he had “showed the wrong map”.

He filed an appeal through counsel Seibing Gunting, and they are now awaiting for hearing to be fixed.

“I am astonished at how things are happening… it seems we the villagers are fighting to move a mountain, but for the big companies it is smooth sailing.

“No government leaders dare to stand up for us in this fight.

“I, for one, would not give up, and we shall see how our appeal fare,” Mohigal said.

42 comments:

  1. Hope that NCR rights will be protected.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let justice prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The first time was on Oct 3, 2006, during the Muslim fasting month when forestry officers came while we were away in Kota Marudu to buy our food stocks. They burnt down 33 houses and poisoned our young rubber trees."

    Betul ke tindakan sebegini terhadap penduduk? Adakah ini merupakan tindakan yang wajar terhadap anak Malaysia? Seharus perkara diselesaikan dengan cara yang lebih berdemokratik. Tidak dapat nak bayangkan keadaan ini berlanjutan sehingga masa kini, pasti ada lebih banyak mangsa.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "But after he won, he never cared to meet and hear us anymore. His people around him were telling us not to bother their boss as our case was not under his jurisdiction (as the incident happened in nearby Beluran district)."

    Terbukti juga banyak tunai dibuat menjelang PRU tetapi tidak menjadi kenyataan selepas mencapai kemenangan. Tidak berhairan bahwa rakyat kecewa dengan sikap kerajaan yang hanya membuat janjian manis sahaja.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kenapa sering penduduk menjadi mangsa NCR? Adakah kerajaan seharus menjalankan sesuatu untuk menjamin hak milik penduduk? Semoga masalah NCR diambil perhatian yang wajar.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Berharap ada pihak yang berani menampil diri untuk memperjuangkan apa yang dimilik oleh semua penduduk. Hak milik dan harta mereka sering dirisikokan terutama terkena sindiket penipuan yang tidak diketahui.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jika tidak berhasrat dan berkemampuan merealisasikan tunai yang dibuat kepada rakyat, lebih baik jangan buat supaya rakyat tidak kecewa dengan kata-kata manis semata-mata untuk tiket undian tersebut. Rakyat seharus lebih bijak menilai terutama parti yang betul-betul berhasrat dan sanggup berjuang hak milik rakyat.

    ReplyDelete
  8. mereka hanya membuat permohonan, tapi belum diluluskan lagi.

    ReplyDelete
  9. tapi dalam hal ini, kerajaan kena utamakan pada mereka yang benar2 berhak.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kita pilih Maximus Ongkili untuk mewakili kita.MO telah tidak peduli kita kali ini tidak apa.Besaok masih ada,PRU 13 buat pilihan betul betul.Jangan saja nanti dikasih MO minuman singgarung dan bahar kamu sudah ingat ini Maximus Ongkili lah manusia yang boleh ganti Jesus Krais.

    Mana ADUN kamu/ Mana anak Si Mahap ? Kita ini orang Bumiputera Dusun tapi nampaknya Musa Aman lebih suka PATI Bugis dan Pelipin daripada Dusun.


    Tanak Tindak Kimaragang
    TB

    ReplyDelete
  11. MP Silam perlu lebih peka dan perihatin terhadap rakyat kawasannya.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bila laporan sudah sampai keluar di sini, pemimpin berkenaan diharap buat tindakan susulan. PRU13 dekat sudah..

    ReplyDelete
  13. permohonan geran penduduk asal memakan masa bertahun2 tapi syarikat2 besar boleh dapat geran tidak pun sampai setahun.kenapa? sebab syarikat2 ni ada kuasa yang sangat besar iaitu 'wang'. dengan wang, semua pun boleh jadi.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mesti ada penjelasan mengenai perkara ni.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jangan berjanji kalau tidak mampu menunaikannya. Berpijak di bumi yang nyata.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Kenapa isu tanah semakin menjadi-jadi.

    ReplyDelete
  17. kadang2 pemimpin pun tidak boleh diharap. mereka hanya tahu bercakap, tindakan tiada.

    ReplyDelete
  18. memang tidak patut tindakan mereka mengusir penduduk asal dengan cara yang kejam sedangkan penduduk sudah lama menduduki dan mengusahakan tanah tersebut.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I dont want to make an assumption, we also need to hear the government explanation on this matter...there's too many "what ifs" in this issues...

    ReplyDelete
  20. mungkinkah masalah ini dapat diselesaikan dengan mengeluarkan geran komunal?

    ReplyDelete
  21. There must be missed communication among them...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Pihak berwajib harus bertemu dengan penduduk dan buat sesi soal jawab.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I rather wait for the other side to make a statement about this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  24. But please make sure, people will not always be your priority.

    ReplyDelete
  25. sebarang isu yang berlaku perlulah diselesaikan dengan sebaiknya.

    ReplyDelete
  26. harap semuanya akan dapat diselesaikan dan kepentingan semua pihak akan sentiasa terjaga.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "In Sabah, villagers' land applications are just recorded but never approved, says a village spokesman."

    Adakah ini disebabkan masalah kesalahan teknikal atau sikap kelalaian atau sindiket penipuan? Semoga masalah tanah NCR dikenalpasti dan mencari cara penyelesaiannya.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Ahli jawatan kuasa yang ditubuhkan akan menjalankan tugasnya dengan berkesan untuk menyelesaikan masalah NCR. Berharap hak miliktanah dipulang kepada pemilik yang sebenar.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Who is the lian behind the mirror in these NCR land issues? Many victims been caught in these issues but yet no proper solution.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hak milik dan harta penduduk sering dirisikokan, seharus kerajaan meningkatkan perhatian agar undang-undang dan akta negara menjamin kesemua hak & kepentingan semua rakyat.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Adakah permohonan penduduk tidak mengikut prosedur yang betul yang menyebabkan permohonan mereka hanya untuk "rekod" sahaja? Adakah pihak berkuasa seharus menjalankan tugas dan memastikan permohonan tanah mengikuti semua kaedah dan syarat? Apakah yang berlaku sebenarnya permohonan penduduk tidak diluluskan?

    ReplyDelete
  32. kita dengar penjelasan dripada pihak kerajaan... tidak boleh dengar dri satu pihak sahaja..

    ReplyDelete
  33. govt will solve this issue..

    ReplyDelete
  34. jawatankuasa komiti untuk menyelesaikan isu2 tanah di sabah telah ditubuhkan oleh kerajaan negeri yang mana dipengerusikan sendiri oleh KM sabah..pasti isu2 tanah di sabah akan dapat diselesaikan.

    ReplyDelete
  35. perkara ini harus diberi perhatian sewajarnya...hak dan kepentingan anak negeri harus diutamakan.

    ReplyDelete
  36. kerajaan akan menyelesaikan masalah ini....pasti ada jalan yg dpt memuaskan hati kedua2 pihak

    ReplyDelete
  37. the best solution is, those in the top post of Jabatan Tanah and Jabatan Perhutanan should be sacked immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  38. kerajaan Sabah patut prihatin dengan masalah2 yang dihadapi oleh rakyat dan menjaga kepentingan hak2 Sabahan bukannnya diketepikan

    ReplyDelete
  39. apakah KM Sabah akan membiarkan permintaan rakyat ini tanpa sebarang tindakan atau penerangan yang logik?

    ReplyDelete
  40. sudah sekian lama rakyat mahukan perubahan, jikalau kerajaan negeri masih tidak mampu mengubah kehidupan rakyat dan prestasi ekonomi Sabah, nescaya rakyat akan 'memihak' kepada pembangkang di PRU akan datang

    ReplyDelete
  41. harap jawatankuasa yang ditubuhkan oleh KM akan dapat mengatasi isu NCR ini dan semoga ianya dapat bekerjasama dengan panel UBF yang baru ditubuhkan oleh JK

    ReplyDelete
  42. hak penduduk setempat perlu dijaga dan wakil rakyat yang terpilih harus membela nasib penduduknya yang tertindas

    ReplyDelete