Search This Blog

Monday, January 7, 2013

Bigotry and racism is not issue in Sabah. !!!


The people in Sabah and Sarawak had long ago decided that religion had to remain a private and personal affair, separate from politics.
 
Several Christian pastors in Malaya have reportedly discussed the idea of Christianity being the official religion of Malaysia. If any part of Malaysia has a case for making Christianity the official religion, its Sabah and Sarawak where the majority of the people, the natives or Orang Asal included, are overwhelmingly Christian.

Instead, the people in Malaysian Borneo decided from the very beginning that they would not have an official religion. The thought of making Christianity the official religion in Sabah and Sarawak never for one minute crossed the minds of the people in these two states. Religion had to remain a private and personal affair, separate from politics and the state.

This decision was reflected in the Cobbold Commission Report, the Inter-Governmental Committee Report and the 1963 Malaysia Agreement.

The Batu Sumpah – Oath Stone – in my hometown Keningau, Sabah, is also a reminder of the promises of Malaysia: no official religion; freedom of religion; respect for adat (customary law); and the state government holds authority over land. The people of the interior, in return, pledged loyalty to Malaysia.

The Oath Stone was meant to overcome the resistance of the people in the interior to Malaysia. They did not understand all the various documents on Malaysia and needed something simple to dramatically translate all their concerns into an enduring form that they could grasp.

The reality is that this provision on Sabah and Sarawak having no official religion has been observed more often than not in the breach.

The goodwill of the people of Sabah and Sarawak has been taken for granted by the federal government.

Former Sabah state secretary Simon Sipaun, now under probe for sedition, best summed up the scenario when he told participants at an inter-party dialogue in Kota Kinabalu in early March that “life in Sabah was better before Malaysia”.

Sipaun pointed out that based on his personal experience in the civil service, that there was no Muslim-Christian conflict in Sabah before Malaysia.

There were no issues like the term Allah – an attribute of God – being reserved only for Muslim use; the Bible not being allowed to be in Malay print; no cases of body snatching at the morgue; non-Muslims not
being allowed freedom of worship and being forced to convert to Islam upon marriage to a Muslim; Muslims not being allowed freedom of worship including the right to leave the religion; and no case of Christians with “Muslim-sounding” names being listed by the authorities as Muslim.

Sipaun stressed that recruitment into the state civil service and promotions before Malaysia were based on merit and not race or religion. Likewise, scholarships were handed out on the basis of merit and not race and religion.

Before Malaysia, the last non-Muslim governor of Sabah was a British.

Since 1963, all governors in Sabah as in Sarawak have been Muslim and the Christians and others have been effectively denied the opportunity to occupy the post. The only time a Christian was appointed governor after 1963 was when Donald Stephens, the Huguan Siou (Paramount Chief) of the Dusuns (including the Kadazan or urban Dusun) and Muruts, converted to Islam after a stint in “virtual exile” in the mid-1970s  as High Commissioner to Australia.

Stephens had a brief first stint as chief minister but was ousted by Kuala Lumpur after he wanted Sabah’s participation in Malaysia “reviewed” upon Singapore’s exit in 1965. Stephens held that the partnership – Sabah, Sarawak, Singapore, and Malaya – that governed the Federation of Malaysia ceased to exist after the city state’s exit. Stephens wanted out.

Stephens made an even briefer second stint as chief minister in 1976 but this time as a Muslim by the name of Mohd Fuad. He came to an untimely end in a plane crash after he held out for a higher oil royalty for Sabah and not a measly five per cent. His predecessor,  Mustapha Harun, was ousted on the same issue but lived to a ripe old age after looking on helplessly when Umno entered Sabah to displace and de-register his United Sabah National Organisation (Usno).

Between Stephens and Joseph Pairin Kitingan, another chief minister (1985-1994) and currently the  Huguan Siou, there was Peter Lo as an interim chief minister.

Another exception was during the rotation of the Sabah chief minister’s post after 1994 when three non-Muslims held the post for brief two-year stints – Yong Teck Lee, Bernard Giluk Dompok and Chong Kah Kiat – to be replaced thereafter by only Muslim chief ministers.

Again, the issue of race and religion seems to predominate in Sabah in line with the “ketuanan Melayu” – Malay supremacy – dictates of the Umno federal government.

Sabahans in general – and the same in Sarawak – are uncomfortable that the politics of race and religion in Peninsular Malaysia has invaded the body politic in their state and resulted in polarization. This has pitted the Muslims, not so much the locals but the illegal immigrants,  against the non-Muslims in every sphere of life in Sabah and Sarawak.

One of the most polarizing issues has been the influx of 1.7 mostly Muslim immigrants from the Philippines and Indonesia to overwhelm the 1.5 million Sabahans. Most of the immigrants are illegals while a minority has employment passes.

To add insult to injury, many illegal immigrants appear to have been issued with Malaysian personal  documents and this has facilitated their placement in the electoral rolls. This lies at the heart of the
continuing marginalization and disenfranchisement of Sabahans, the natives or Orang Asal in particular including local Muslims.

It’s not known how many thousand illegal immigrants have since become “instant natives” by the simple backdoor method of securing Malaysian personal documents, which place their birth officially as somewhere in Sabah. Officially, they are listed as “Malays”, a classification which did not exist in Sabah before 1963.

Muslims in Sabah are generally listed as Bajau, Suluk, Barunai (Brunei Malay), Irranun or Dusun. The last category may be Ranau, Bisaya or Orang Sungei, among others. Most Dusun in Sabah are Christian if they
are not animists or pagans. The Dusun are also one of the two original native groups in neighboring Brunei, the other being Dayak.

Sabahans and Sarawakians would not agree with any proposal that Christianity be recognized as the official religion of Malaysia or at least in their half of the country on the other side of the South China Sea. If  Christians in Peninsular Malaysia want their religion to be the official one for the state, it’s their cause which they have to pursue on their own.

However, Sabahans and Sarawakians would very much want the race and religion factors to be removed from the politics and administration of their states. They would very much want life to be as it was before
Malaysia when there was also no fear of the police, as Sipaun observed, no draconian laws like the Internal Security Act (ISA) and no emergency ordinances governing the populace.

Putrajaya should stop pursuing Umno’s “ketuanan Melayu” agenda in Sabah and Sarawak and ruling the state through local proxies. The politics in these states militates against such a mindset. The local populace does not have a fixation, as in Malaya, with the Chinese being in business or being wealthy.

Malaysia has now become a joke, in the eyes of the global community.

Malaysia will never be the same for as long as the current regime continues to harp on racial issues, through their mouth piece such as Perkasa, Pembela and Utusan Malaysia or anything you just name it.

The  time has come and it's NOW, that Change is inevitable. I read this article and found it relevant, and want the share it with you.

(Capt. Ir. Joseph Lakai ~ SAPP Vice Chairman N34 Liawan CLC)

75 comments:

  1. artikel ini bukan ditulis oleh Joseph Lakai.. sumber asal adalah dari link ini http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2011/05/09/race-religion-not-issues-for-sabah-sarawak/

    tarikh artikel 9 May 2011 dan ditulis oleh Jow Fernandez..

    ini bukan pertama kali Joseph Lakai CURI artikel orang.. malu la sikit bro!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MALAYSIA = "SECURITY & HARMONY" OR "INSECURITY & DISHARMONY"?
      IT'S ALL PART OF UMNO'S "MELAYU RAYA AGENDA"

      "Keamanan dan keharmonian yang dinikmati hari ini adalah hasil daripada perjuangan pemimpin-pemimpin terdahulu. Mereka berjuang dengan gigih dan mengenepikan perbezaan demi memastikan keamanan dan kesejahteraan untuk masa depan negara dan generasi akan datang".

      The reply to this comment is seen in this comment on "Malaysia or Melayu Raya"
      “MALAYSIA” OR “MELAYU RAYA”?

      People all over the world have stood up to fight for real independence and most of them of gained their independence and achieved self-rule since the 1950s.

      Sarawak and Sabah are 2 exceptions in South East Asia.

      In the 1960s many Sarawak people resisted “Malaysia” as a new colonisation plan to transfer colonial rule from Britain to Malaya and demanded real independence. The British ignored their demands and coerced Sarawak into Malaysia under Malayan rule.

      After 50 years we have seen enough proofs with our own eyes that we were really re-colonised!

      Yet we are here still making kopi shop talk about not getting development funds etc when we have lost all our rights as equal citizens with “independence in Malaysia”.

      We did not get what they promised us.

      How can there be independence when Sarawak was independent on 22 July 1963 and then quickly swallowed up by the python Malaya on 16 September 1963?

      The history time line shows Sarawak (and Sabah) continued to be colonies-

      1. Sarawak was an independent state from 1841 to 1941
      2. Japan conquered and occupied Sarawak from (Dec) 1941 to 1945
      3. Britain seized control of Sarawak and made it a colony from 1945 to 1963
      4. Malaya was transferred the colonial power over Sarawak by Britain on 16 September 1963.

      Sarawak was a colony for the last 70 years.

      Real Sarawakians with pride in their country should not allow this foreign domination and rule to go on!

      So many of us young and old now can understand what patriotic Sarawakians said over 50 years ago- that “Malaysia” a new colonial plan by Britain and Malaya to keep us colonised!

      If we are really independent why are we being ruled directly from Kuala Lumpur. Should we not be functioning as an independent state like Brunei and Singapore?

      Brunei stayed out of Malaysia when the then Sultan smartly saw through UMNO’s Melayu Raya plan to dominate the Borneo colonies.

      Singapore was lucky to leave Malaysia by 1965 when it actually experienced the reality of UMNO domination plans.

      The “leader” of Sarawak and Sabah led us into the pythons mouth and some of them knowingly did so in betrayal of our interests for their own gain.

      Cont'd Part 2.

      Reposted- a comment by SARAWAKIAN PATRIOTS — from Hornbill Unleashed 06.01.2013

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJanuary 6, 2013 12:03 PM

      Part 2.

      THE RAW DEAL WE GOT OUT OF BEING “INDEPENDENT IN MALAYSIA”

      Today we suffer from their decision to sell out Sarawak and getting a ponzi deal out of being in Malaysia.

      “Ponzi deal” means that the Malayans took our wealth and gave us back just a little bit our own money and made us poorer in real terms than before 1963 while they built Malaya on our wealth. We don’t need to go into the many areas where they and their local collaborators cheated us with promises of “development” and where they abused their trust and “developed” themselves privately.

      The other ponzi or fraudulent part of the bargain is that Malaysia is fast being transformed into “Melayu Raya”.

      Point 5 of the Sarawak 18 and Sabah 20 Points Agreements with Malaya says simply in black and white –

      “Point 5: Name of Federation

      “Malaysia” but not “Melayu Raya”
      ……………………………………………………………

      Point 5 reflected the real fears of Sabah and Sarawak people that UMNO would use Malaysia as a vehicle to create its “Melayu Raya” instead of an egalitarian multi-national “Malaysia”.

      The ‘Melayu Raya’ idea has come to the fore in the last 5 years when UMNO and its followers beat their racist domination drum more loudly and declared non “Malays” (a flexible term used to churn out instant foreign Muslims into “Malays” with the right to vote) and non Muslim people as pendatangs.

      How is it that not only the Chinese born and bred in Sarawak but also every other race including the majority Dayaks who are not Muslim not citizens in their own country Sarawak?

      So we have already got what we feared will be “Melayu Raya” 50 years ago. Under the NEP Malaya proceed to created a “Melayu Raya” after may 13 1969 replacing the “Malaysia” concept with UMNO’s supremacist religious Apartheid system.

      Is this not what POINT 5 is against?

      We did not get what they promised us and agreed to in writing. They broke the agreements. (They repudiated these agreement and treated them and the people with contempt!)

      But it does not mean we should just try to fix things up from this bad deal.

      We can also take Sarawak out of Malaysia. That is our right which was even denied to us!

      That means we must unite and fight to take back this right and take back our country Sarawak!

      Make that your new year resolution!


      reposted- comment by SARAWAKIAN PATRIOTS — from Hornbill Unleashed 06.01.2013

      Delete
  2. sebelum ini Joseph Lakai pernah kantoi MENCURI artikel berkenaan dengan isu double six (http://www.borneobullet.blogspot.com/2012/12/siapa-joseph-lakai.html)..

    tulisan asal oleh Hakim Joe, tapi diubah oleh si Joseph kononnya hasil tulisan beliau..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ya lah...buat ikut suka hati saja...nanti yang menderita ialah rakyat.

      Delete
    2. Jeff ambuyat tidak nampak kah perkataan ini:
      The time has come and it's NOW, that Change is inevitable. I read this article and found it relevant, and want the share it with you.

      Delete
  3. kalau beginilah tahap profesionlaism pemimpin2 SAPP, suka CURI hasil tulisan orang lain, baik jangan berpolitik la.. silap2 kerajaan sabah boleh jadi tunggang langgang kerana ketandusan idea untuk mentadbir negeri..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies


    1. Jeff ambuyat tidak nampak kah perkataan ini:
      The time has come and it's NOW, that Change is inevitable. I read this article and found it relevant, and want the share it with you.

      Delete
  4. Semangat 1Malaysia yang telah lama sebati dan menjadi budaya dalam kehidupan rakyat Malaysia di Sabah menurut KM Datuk Musa Aman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sabah dan sarawak adalah contoh terbaik semangat 1Malaysia...

      Delete
    2. Perpaduan dan keharmonian antara kaum di Sabah adalah yang terbaik.

      Delete
    3. Apa berlaku pada masa lalu adalah sejarah yang harus di ingati.

      Delete
  5. Semangat itu perlu terus dipupuk dan dihayati bagi membolehkan rakyat terus bersatu padu dan bersama-sama bergerak maju untuk membentuk masyarakat Malaysia yang berjaya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Semangat perpaduan rakyat harus dipupuk sejak kecil lagi.

      Delete
  6. “Dengan mempunyai lebih daripada 32 suku kaum dan etnik dan kita bertutur dalam bahasa yang berbeza serta mengamalkan tradisi dan adat resam masing-masing namun kita tetap bersatu, saling mempercayai dan saling menghormati antara satu dengan lain,” kata Musa.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Keamanan dan keharmonian yang dinikmati hari ini adalah hasil daripada perjuangan pemimpin-pemimpin terdahulu. Mereka berjuang dengan gigih dan mengenepikan perbezaan demi memastikan keamanan dan kesejahteraan untuk masa depan negara dan generasi akan datang.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rakyat Sabah jangan terpedaya dengan tindakan tidak bertanggungjawab pihak-pihak tertentu yang hanya akan menghancurkan kemajuan,kemakmuran dan keharmonian yang telah dibina.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unsur yang merosakkan keharmonian, perpaduan dan perkembangan harus dielakkan.

      Delete
    2. Jangan terpengaruh dengan unsur-unsur yang cuba merosakkan keamanan yang ada .

      Delete
  9. Sabah kaya dengan budaya yang penuh dengan kesepakatan dan semangat muhibah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TETAPI KETUANAN MELAYU YANG DI DOKONG OLEH UMNO DAN BN MENGHACURKAN SEMUANYA......

      Delete
    2. Sifat keagamaan yang teramat kuat harus merosakkan perpaduan antara kaum.

      Delete
  10. semangat perpaduan yang diamalkan selama ini kerana sikap bertolak ansur masyarakat majmuk mengenai betapa pentingnya hidup bermuafakat dan rukun damai demi mewujudkan suasana harmoni di kalangan semua kaum.

    ReplyDelete
  11. sikap toleransi ini membolehkan negara-negara luar menjadikan Malaysia sebagai contoh terbaik kerana mereka tertarik dengan keunikan budaya berbilang bangsa yang menjadikan perpaduan kaum sebagai satu pegangan hidup sejak dahulu lagi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perpaduan yang rakyat amali memberi imej baik agar pelaburan asing juga berkeyakinan dengan perkembangan di Sabah.

      Delete
  12. nsep 1Malaysia akan menjadi landasan kukuh untuk masyarakat majmuk memelihara perpaduan yang sedia terjalin sekali gus menjayakan matlamat kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN) ke arah menjadikan negara ini sebuah negara maju menjelang Wawasan 2020.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kita seharusnya berbangga biarpun negara ini memiliki masyarakat yang terdiri dari pelbagai lapisan tetapi mampu hidup bersatu padu dan saling hormati-menghormati. Oleh itu, menjadi tanggungjawab kepada kita semua untuk memelihara suasana harmoni ini,

    ReplyDelete
  14. BN bukan sahaja bekerja keras untuk meningkatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi negara tetapi turut menekankan pemupukan perpaduan yang membolehkan masyarakat majmuk hidup rukun damai.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Racism has existed throughout human history. It may be defined as the hatred of one person by another -- or the belief that another person is less than human -- because of skin color, language, customs, place of birth or any factor that supposedly reveals the basic nature of that person. It has influenced wars, slavery, the formation of nations, and legal codes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Racism and discrimination have been used as powerful weapons encouraging fear or hatred of others in times of conflict and war, and even during economic downturns.

      Delete
    2. Are Malaysians really racists? That would be a question which only the Malaysian people can answer.

      Delete
    3. It is possible that this country is not, by majority, filled with racists, but instead that Malaysia has been subjected to unfortunate and sometimes insidiously enforced policies, which gives the impression that we are racists.

      Delete
    4. Taking a general view of Malaysian society, there is hardly any open, blatant racism.

      Delete
    5. For example, in the US, at the peak of racism, African Americans were not allowed to share seats in buses with White Americans in some states. That was a dark moment in American history and their Senate had to intervene with laws to legislate that. Policies in America also changed to discourage segregation.

      Delete
    6. Unlike in the US, any Malaysian can hitch a ride on a bus and share seats with people of different races. This is, of course, a simplistic example. Perhaps Malaysians may feel otherwise.

      Delete
    7. People may feel that we need such laws. Malaysians may also feel that we should discuss and perhaps debate on this proposed law.

      Delete
    8. So, do we need race relations laws in Malaysia? Or do we actually need race relations policies instead? And if we do introduce race relations laws, what would they contain? So many questions. So many issues.

      Delete
  16. I dont understand why Allah issue is being debated.

    ReplyDelete
  17. And after all keep blaming Christians.

    ReplyDelete
  18. God should not be in the center of political attack.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Racism should not be an issue in Sabah.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Why religion has to do with politics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pihak2 tertentu yang politikkan isu agama utk kepentingan politik mereka sendiri.

      Delete
  21. Jangan sesekali menggunakan agama sebagai landasan politik.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bagi saya, isu ini amat sensitif.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Replies
    1. Rakyat perlu hargai dan berusaha kekalkan perpaduan.

      Delete
  24. Most importantly. Sabahans know how to differentiate it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Jangan gunakan alasan agama sebagai tunjang untuk sesuatu.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Sabah has never had this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sorry to say but Islam is not the official religion for Sabah.

    ReplyDelete
  28. So what if Christianity is being practised in Sabah?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No big deal to Sabahans, religious tolerance is always practiced here.

      Delete
  29. Aman damai di Sabah jangan di kacau.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adalah peranan rakyat Sabah untuk mengekalkan keamanan dan perpaduan dalam negeri.

      Delete
  30. Pertikai kepercayaan hanya akan memecahkan perpaduan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perpaduan perlulah dikekalkan, jangan merosakkan perpaduan rakyat.

      Delete
  31. apa yang pasti ialah agama dan kepercayaan tidak harus dicampur adukkan dengan politik...ia harus dipisahkan..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Politik haruslah dipisahkan dengan isu agama ataupun bangsa.

      Delete
  32. Sabahans have high level of race and religious acceptance, no bigotry or racism here.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Jeff ambuyat tidak nampak kah perkataan ini:

    The time has come and it's NOW, that Change is inevitable. "I read this article and found it relevant, and want the share it with you."

    ReplyDelete
  34. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad labelled all Malaysians “racists”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The former prime minister shrugged off criticisms, pointing out that it was common for anyone to ignore the interests of others when trying to get their way.

      Delete
  35. This country, everybody is racist. Now, everybody talks about his own interest, doesn’t care about other people’s interest

    ReplyDelete
  36. we are all a little racist whether Malays, Chinese, Ibans, Bidayuhs, Indians and others.

    ReplyDelete
  37. racism is not necessarily something we believe in but something that seeps into the subconscious from modern-day culture.

    ReplyDelete
  38. in Malaysia or anywhere in the world, exploring or talking about racism is very much a taboo.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Malaysians are a bit racist, just that they probably don’t realise it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Let’s be frank. Being racist isn’t just about thinking one race is better than the other. It is also about excluding somebody else socially.

    ReplyDelete