Search This Blog

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Harris's RM50 million suit against Yong

KOTA KINABALU: The High Court here yesterday started hearing a RM50 million suit brought by former Chief Minister Tan Sri Harris Salleh against Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) president Datuk Yong Teck Lee and the party for allegedly insinuating he (Harris) was involved in causing the plane crash that killed his predecessor Tun Fuad Stephens and also 10 others on board the Nomad aircraft on June 6, 1976.


Harris, 81, who was the first witness to testify before Justice Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebli, filed the suit on June 6 last year claiming general damages, aggravated and exemplary damages of not less than RM50 million to be assessed separately against Yong and SAPP as the first and second defendants respectively.

He is also seeking an injunction to restrain the defendants whether by themselves or their servants or employees or agents from printing aud publishing further the statements and similar libel in any form or means.

In his testimony, Harris, who is represented by counsel Yusof Maringking and Trevor Maringking, told the court that an official enquiry was set up by the Federal Minister of Transport to investigate the cause of the plane crash which came to be known as Double Six Tragedy as it happened on June 6, 1976.

He said an Australia team of Nomad experts was flown to Sabah to help in the investigation on the incident by a coroner.

Asked by his counsel Yunof whether he could recall the findings made by the coroner as to the cause of the plane crash, Harris said, "I can only remember that it was said to be an accident but from the newspaper cutting in the Bundle of Documents, the cause of the air crash was raised in Parliament sometime in December 2009."

He said that during that time, the then Deputy Transport Minister was reported to have said that the investigation on the accident showed that the crash was due to overloading, pilot error and an absence of radar instrument.

To another question whether he was aware of any other investigation done on the cause of the air crash, Harris said he did not know whether there was other official investigation made on the incident but he was given a VCD about a journalistic investigation undertaken by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Four Corners Television Programme entitled "Lies In The Sky".

He said the programme revealed crucial information regarding Nomad aircraft, similar to the one that crashed with the late Tun Fuad Stephens and others on board. Harris said it was said that since the early 1970s, there were already operation problems with the plane and a number of such aircraft had already crashed.

"It was also reported in the VCD that the Australian RAFFA pilots refused to fly Nomad aircraft," he said.
Harris told the court that prior to taking this action he had never been accused by anyone directly or indirectly of criminal involvement in the air crash which took the lives of his friends and prominent Sabah leaders.

He claimed that the defendants had accused and insinuated that he was involved in the air crash in Sembulan.

He said Yong made a press statement on April 5, 2010 asking for re-investigation into the air crash to remove all doubts about the true cause following Tengku Razaleigh's account of how he left the ill-fated aircraft at the very last moment that saved his life.

The plaintiff said he responded in a press statement on April 7, 2010, pointing out that Yong's statement was inaccurate both in fact and interpretation.

"The first defendant made a follow-up statement with aggressive contents on April 9, 2010 by using words such as 'something big and explosive', 'crime' and 'assassination' which are directly or indirectly insinuating against me of criminal acts. Therefore, I have no alternative but to take this legal action to clear my name," he said.

He said it was not true that he had invited Tengku Razaleigh to board the other plane at the last moment in order to save him.

Harris told the court that Tengku Razaleigh's programme was pre-arranged by the State Government of Sabah and agreed by the latter to include a visit to the Banggi Island's Cattle Farm.

He said the defendants' claim of 'new information' revealed by Tengku Razaleigh concerning the air crash was false and malicious as the latter had already agreed and decided earlier on the invitation to visit the cattle farm during an interview concerning the incident which was recorded in the book entitled 'The Life and Death of Tun Fuad Stephens' and also in the book entitled 'Harris Salleh of Sabah'.

Harris said the publication of the defamatory statement in the newspapers caused embarrassment to him and gravely injured and tarnished his reputation and integrity, and he suffered loss and damage as a result.

He said the said newspaper articles defamed him as the defendants' statement meant or could be understood to mean that he must be investigated as he had knowledge beforehand about the air crash and or that he must be investigated because he had conspired with others to grab power and to become the Chief Minister of Sabah after the demise of the late Tun Fuad Stephens, by way of assassination.

He said the defendants' statement was also understood to mean that he had conspired with others to facilitate the signing of the petroleum agreement between the Sabah and Federal governments as well as to hand over the petroleum wealth of Sabah to Petronas or the Federal Government.

Harris said the defendants' call to re-investigate the air crash was not made in good faith because what Tengku Razaleigh generally stated was already recorded in books and publicly available which the defendants knew or ought to have known the true facts.

Meanwhile, during cross-examination by counsel Datuk Simon Shim, who acted for both defendants, Harris told the court that the result of the investigation on the plane crash was announced by a coroner.

He said as far as he remembered, the result was announced by the coroner after the investigation on the plane crash.

Harris disagreed withr the counsel's suggestion that there were a few versions of the cause of the crash.

However, he agreed with Simon that the two books referred to by the former had highlighted four possible causes of the incident, namely aircraft overloading, pilot error, design fault of the aircraft and sabotage.

When referred to several documents, the plaintiff agreed with Simon's suggestion that that the former's name was not mentioned in those articles.

However, the plaintiff said that although his name was not mentioned, the statements by the defendants were aimed at him as they were based on Tengku Razaleigh's full statement that he (the plaintiff) had pulled him out of the said aircraft and saved his life.

That implied I knew that there was something going to happen to the aircraft," he said.

Simon is assisted by counsel Flora Dius.

BP

48 comments:

  1. Well, in China, Harris who was leading the riot in Karamunsing should be shot causing immense damage to properties, creating havoc, human injuries..possibly rape and death (not reported that time) and more so, using illegal immigrants to do the (paid) job.

    Do you think he should be shot? Mine is a Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Harris is a traitor to Sabahan!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Now Harris Salleh wanted to sue Yong Teck Lee? Did I read that right?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sure the people knew what happened more or less, we'll just wait for the truth to unfold.

    ReplyDelete
  5. harris dan yong, dua2 tak boleh pakai.

    ReplyDelete
  6. hal ini tak perlu lagi diungkit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Rakyat want to know the truth. We want more % on oil royalty in the long run nomatter what had happened

    ReplyDelete
  8. Harris and Yong.... kedua2nya bersalah... masing2 cuba untuk melindungi diri masing2..

    ReplyDelete
  9. pastikan sambil melayan masalah2 sesama, rakyat jangan pula diabaikan.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Semoga pertengkaran ini akan reda dan memberi peluang kepada rakyat menilai dengan baik.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Macam best pula mahu tengok dorang ni begigit.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yong dan Harris seharus memperhentikan konflik di antaranya untuk kebaikan kedua-dua parti yang diwakili.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "He said that during that time, the then Deputy Transport Minister was reported to have said that the investigation on the accident showed that the crash was due to overloading, pilot error and an absence of radar instrument."

    Berita lama tidak harus diungkit yang menyebabkan ketidak senang hati kepada keluarganya.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bukan kah kes sudah tutup, kenapa mengungkit lagi?

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Harris, who is represented by counsel Yusof Maringking and Trevor Maringking, told the court that an official enquiry was set up by the Federal Minister of Transport to investigate the cause of the plane crash which came to be known as Double Six Tragedy as it happened on June 6, 1976."

    Siasatan punca-punca kemalangan itu harus dibuat dengan teliti.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hope the truth be able to reveal.

    ReplyDelete
  17. There had been old cases in other part of the world being re-opened for investigation.
    This will help clear the name of the innocents.
    Let justice prevail. This is not just about the families of the victims, it is about justice and the matters being handled in our country.
    For the country to move forward, there must be transparency. Only ghosts are afraid of light.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hal ini sudah lama berlalu, tumpukan apa yg lebih penting sekarang ini...

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yg suda berlalu,biarla jadi sejarah,tidak perlu di ungkit2 lagi...

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jika diungkit balik kisah lama ini, nnti waris2 yg terlibat akan terasa..

    ReplyDelete
  21. Lebih baik biarkan sahaja perkara yg telah selesai ini berlalu..

    ReplyDelete
  22. Only GOD and that "person" knows what actually happen that day.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I hope the truth will reveal soon.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Kenapa ungkit perkara yang menyakitkan hati terutama mangsa keluarga? Apakah manfaatnya berbuat demikian?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Serve no purpose. Move forward can put more attention to more important matter like PATI, land grab etc. Its bring more benefit to the people as compare these.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Jika betulnya punca kemalangan ini dapat dikesani, apakah tindakan selanjutnya sebenarnya? Membuat ganti rugi? Membawa kes ke mahkamah?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Konflik antara 2 hero ini tiada ending pun sampai bila-bila. Biar lah mereka ni, tidak perlu menumpu terlalu banyak perhatian kepada mereka ni. Banyak isu yang lagi penting memerlukan perhatian.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Isu ini harus dilupakan agar tidak mengungkit perasaan tidak senang hati semu agolongan.

    ReplyDelete
  29. jikalau isu ini terpaksa dibangkitkan semula, pastikan kebenaran diperolehi demi kebaikan keluarga mangsa yang terlibat...

    ReplyDelete
  30. jika tidak, pengungkitan peristiwa silam yang pahit tentu tidak akan menggembirakan mereka yang terlibat secara langsung

    ReplyDelete
  31. harap ada penyelesaian dan penutupan dalam kes ini..

    ReplyDelete
  32. nampaknya, kedua-dua bekas Ketua Menteri Sabah ini, masing-masing tidak mahu mengaku kalah..masing-masing mempunyai strategi untuk menjatuhkan imej dan maruah sesama sendiri...

    ReplyDelete
  33. semoga, keputusan muktamad dari mahkamah dapat diperolehi

    ReplyDelete
  34. I hope stop accusing each other.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Masalah ini harus diselesaikan.

    ReplyDelete
  36. terpulanglah kepada mereka berdua bagaimana mereka akan menyelesaikan konflik mereka.

    ReplyDelete
  37. saman saja ba.. itu saja cara paling efektif untuk membersihkan nama.. good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Setiap pemimpin ada kelemahan mereka sendiri. Begitu juga dengan Datuk HArris dan juga Yong.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Mari kita lihat sampai mana kes ini diheboh-hebohkan.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Kita tunggulah dan lihat bagaimana nanti.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Siapa yang akan menang jika Harris menyaman Yong Teck Lee?

    ReplyDelete
  42. rakyat hanya dapat membuat pelbagai andaian berhubung tragedi ini.

    ReplyDelete
  43. memang susahlah mau selesai kalau isu2 melibatkan orang2 besar ni.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Kenapa Haris tidak naik kapal tu last minute?? Kalau Labuan pun sanggup jual..

    ReplyDelete
  45. Cepat-cepatlah tu kebenaran muncul. Kita tengok siapa yang kena.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Seriously serious this has turned out.

    ReplyDelete